This is the first book that collects information from various sources to determine how the wide availability of television affects society. Mander believes that "television and democratic society are incompatible" due to television removing all of society's senses except for seeing and hearing. The author states that television makes it so that people have no common sense which leads to, as Cornell University professor Rose K. Golden wrote for the journal Contemporary Sociology, being "powerless to reject the camera's line of sight, reset the stage, or call on our own sensory apparatus to correct the doctored sights and sounds the machine delivers". Mander's four arguments in the book to eliminate television are that telecommunication removes the sense of reality from people, television promotes capitalism, television can be used as a scapegoat, and that all three of these issues negatively work together.

.

Michael Comber of The Cambridge Quarterly disagreed with Mander's arguments, stating that television has room for multiple ideologies

As Chomsky showed, any sufficiently radical voice will be censored after 5 minutes. TV diversity is just multiple mutant strains of status quo liberalism

  • AnachoCrapitalist [they/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    3 years ago
    1. Commercials. 2. Corporate owned news. 3. Home shopping network parasites. 4. Rick and Marty. 5. Commercials.

    Am I a journalist yet?

    The real solution is obviously smellovision.