What you really need is an executive branch that tells the courts to take a walk. If they can't enforce their decisions, it doesn't matter how bad they are.
Not saying that wouldn't rock, but the executive ignoring the courts explicitly would lead to the collapse of the government and probably some kind of coup.
deleted by creator
That assumes that the originalists are consistent or genuinely believe in originalism, but they unfortunately do not
What you really need is an executive branch that tells the courts to take a walk. If they can't enforce their decisions, it doesn't matter how bad they are.
Not saying that wouldn't rock, but the executive ignoring the courts explicitly would lead to the collapse of the government and probably some kind of coup.
Promise? :bloomer:
They’ve already done that in the past and the country is still here. :shrug-outta-hecks:
Andrew Jackson was way more intimidating and uncivil than basically any modern American politician tho, especially :biden-troll: .
deleted by creator
The Origins of judicial review is a case about the legitimacy of judicial review brought before the Supreme Court. Which is so funny.
deleted by creator
The court has investigated allegations of wrongdoing and found itself innocent.