In my continued exposure to leftist spaces and a leftist view on history it has become clear that all I understand about Stalin is the reactionary rhetoric I've been fed my whole life. I have only just started on reading theory and exposing myself to a leftist view, so Stalin as a topic isn't something I've reached yet.

But I have to ask, and I think this is the place to ask it, what is the deal with Stalin?

The vibe I get is that people at a minimum don't hate Stalin, but also maybe at most appricate Stalin. I'm aware that the efforts of the USSR during WW2, especially in regards to Nazi aggression are a credit to his administration and leadership, but is that really where the vibe starts and stops?

I'm not looking for a dissertation on the guy, but just the notes or primary points. I'll take reading suggestions too.

Thanks comrades.

  • RedWizard [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is a good reminder. I was aware of double genocide theory but connecting it to the foundation of NATO and how it shaped our view of the USSR is important as well.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      4 months ago

      Blackshirts and Reds makes that point a lot better than I did, I forgot to mention it in the comment.

        • FunkyStuff [he/him]
          ·
          4 months ago

          It's incredibly easy to get through, especially if you've already read other pieces of theory or books on history. Parenti doesn't write in a fancy or particularly sophisticated way, it's extremely entry level.

          • Biggay [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            4 months ago

            He always writes everything for a blue-collar audience, although the topics can still be pretty complicated he wants the topics to be accessible.

        • D61 [any]
          ·
          4 months ago

          Short read, easy to get into and get through.

          Super easy to reread when you need something to do.

      • RedWizard [he/him]
        hexagon
        ·
        4 months ago

        I read it recently but I think I need to reread it.