I don't follow astrology and know nothing about it.
I was going back and forth because i thought the guy was arguing that nature has no scientific patterns. And what he thought i was saying is that since there is scientific proof that nature has patterns than i am trying to equate that to astrology being real. Which I'm not.
I'm also not saying that it's not real. Cuz i don't know. But i don't base my habits on where the moon is
You’re falling into a really simple logical error here.
Just because patterns exist doesn’t mean everything you observe as a pattern is actually a pattern.
Just because, for example, trees branch in a specific pattern, does not mean there is a pattern that explains your personality based on whether Mars was waning when you were born.
I read what a Virgo was. Went hey that lines up with me. And that was the end of it. When I say nature is patterns, I'm literally meaning in the scientific sense that nature is patterns. That waves have a pattern to them that birds roost in the same tree every night that sea turtles go back to the beach. They were born at that humpback whales go back to the same bay that they gave birth at every year. That's what I'm saying when I mean nature. Is patterns not astrology.
Sorry i should of made it clear that i don't actually follow astrology.
But also getting upset by it is really a waste of energy
Cool
Not a dude
Nature is literally nothing but patterns. But you can think what you want.
Sounds like what a hominid with a pattern seeking obsessed brain would say
Lol. You sound really disconnected from the planet. But almost all modern Americans are.
this can't be real lmao
What is really real
Not the real problem with the disconnection of americans being a lack of astrology, thats for sure
Americans have no connection to nature. Thats what I'm saying.
nature =/= mystical patterns
Lol. Once again
I don't follow astrology and know nothing about it.
I was going back and forth because i thought the guy was arguing that nature has no scientific patterns. And what he thought i was saying is that since there is scientific proof that nature has patterns than i am trying to equate that to astrology being real. Which I'm not.
I'm also not saying that it's not real. Cuz i don't know. But i don't base my habits on where the moon is
ahh got it
Oh, I dont see patterns in tea leaves and tarot cards, I must need to touch grass.
Maybe you need to learn to enjoy nature without projecting your mystical nonsense onto it.
Lol. Why are you so aggro?
Because your ideas are insulting to what limited agency humans actually have
Theres whole books, articles, scientific pursuit of studying nature and it's actual patterns.
To repeat:
You’re falling into a really simple logical error here.
Just because patterns exist doesn’t mean everything you observe as a pattern is actually a pattern.
Just because, for example, trees branch in a specific pattern, does not mean there is a pattern that explains your personality based on whether Mars was waning when you were born.
I don't follow astrology.
I read what a Virgo was. Went hey that lines up with me. And that was the end of it. When I say nature is patterns, I'm literally meaning in the scientific sense that nature is patterns. That waves have a pattern to them that birds roost in the same tree every night that sea turtles go back to the beach. They were born at that humpback whales go back to the same bay that they gave birth at every year. That's what I'm saying when I mean nature. Is patterns not astrology.
Sorry i should of made it clear that i don't actually follow astrology.
But also getting upset by it is really a waste of energy
deleted by creator
You're falling into a really simple logical error here.
Just because patterns exist doesn't mean everything you observe as a pattern is actually a pattern.