Theres no new information in this article but it’s interesting for a couple of reasons
First, in regard to omicron it admits the sub variants “are genetically different enough that they could have had their own Greek names. But for some reason, this did not happen, and the World Health Organization designated them as subvariants of Omicron.”
It’s essential to keep the brand name “Omicron” because that was sold to the public as being less dangerous (now known to be false) and suitable for herd immunity (it’s not - it’s exceptionally good at re-infection), so any newly named variant would destroy the illusion that Covid is ‘over’.
Second, the article points out the Wuhan strain had an R0 of 3.3, whereas the latest Omicron variant has an R0 of 18.6, ie it’s the most contagious virus ever along with measles.
Third, not only is the latest Omicron strain a ‘master at evading immunity’, “a Japanese research group found that in lab-based, cell-culture experiments, BA.4/5 was able to replicate more efficiently in the lungs than BA.2. In hamster experiments, it developed into more serious illness.”.
The article ends by noting that new Omicron specific vaccines are on the way (in trials). But given the number of anti-vaxxers and the fact that the ip will be locked up, Omnicron will surely evolve away from these and the vaccines will fail in the same way that the original ones did.
Its unusual to see an msm source be so blunt with the facts. I wonder how long society can continue amidst ever increasing death and long term damage while the fiction that ‘Covid is over’ competes with the fiction that it was always just like the flu. There must be some kind of tipping point…
it feels like we're living through a Native American smallpox moment
deleted by creator
Much worse because the longterm effects compound. Smallpox can blind you but it just leaves most victims scarred if it doesn't kill them. Even a mild case of COVID can cause long COVID which is as much cardiovascular and pulmonary as it is neurological. A severe one impacts every organ system either directly or as a result of what ICU care actually entails. Each new case and variant is playing Russian roulette with the risk of either. The lower death rate means state, capital, and the public can ignore it. Not having such a visible consequence to infection means it can be minimised as a respiratory illness on par with influenza (but not the kind that kills millions of people and that these freaks didn't believe in either). It's going to become a cycle of background genocide that targets the most vulnerable demographics which are also the most inconvenient to the bourgeoisie.
COVID's the most horrifying illness I've ever seen. You couldn't design a better longterm killer than it short of plague, and we can effectively control plague with minimal impact to society.
This is my understanding as well.
The question I have is: Is the long-term complication rate really as low as 10-20% (long COVID)? Or is it much higher than that, but with symptoms so mild that many people are overlooking it?
https://www.wfyi.org/news/articles/insurance-death-rates-working-age-people-up-40-percent
chuds blame this 40% increase on the vaccine, but I see it as the natural conclusion of repeated COVID-reinfection among vulnerable phenotypes.
libs and many leftists also blame this on the wrong thing, which is "not enough people getting vaccinated". Vaccines have zero efficacy against long-COVID, and from what I've seen only mildly reduce viral load/spread. The fact that insurance companies are targeting unvaccinated areas shows they have no idea what they're doing either. (don't get me wrong I hate chuds and broken clock etc)
My suspicion is that many of these people are dying of compounded long-COVID: long-COVID itself is bad, but from my experience recoverable and somewhat bearable.
However, getting covid AGAIN, WHILE you are still recovering from long-COVID, makes it worse. And maybe pushes it over the edge into fatal-damage territory. More spike protein = more damage
I could really see this being an actual Native American smallpox moment, where people just progressively die at higher rates, the virus continually evolving into more contagious and deadly forms, until eventually a huge percentage, or even a majority of the population is done in by the virus. Of course, if that happens, it may not end that way, because something may be done about it before it gets that bad
Basically I'm wondering whether the people who are "immune" to COVID, are actually fundamentally immune? Or are they simply suffering less damage (in which case they too are at risk if the virus evolves)
asymptomatic people can still get long covid
unless we do thorough testing on everyone (not just people w/ covid symptoms) including blood draws and ct scans we'll never know
my prediction is that the average global average lifespan is going to tank.
With long COVID I'm primarily concerned about how much it ties up medical resources. One thing hogs always point to is that cancer and heart disease kill so many more people. Those patients and their complex specialist needs are competing for appointment slots with chronic COVID impacts. Since COVID is affecting so many systems, that's everything from transplant surgeons to cardiologists to radiology to labs to ambulances to nursing homes. An increased burden on the medical system as staff are leaving because of the trauma of treating COVID and the existing resource strain will only compound the things destroying that system. It's hard to measure what a COVID death is when you're just a regular cardiomyopathy patient who can't get a new heart because there's a surge in demand for them and fewer beds available. Both on individual and systemic levels each new wave is going to take away more of our jenga blocks that allow us to withstand the next one.
well one of the main reasons smallpox killed so many American Natives is because they were totally isolated from Afroeurasia for 20,000+ years
In addition to that, their hygienic standards (while better than europe for sure) were probably still lower than modern people's
when you take that into account, COVID-19 is causing all this damage DESPITE us all living in a global civilization with near-constant inoculation--now imagine how bad it would be if we lived in isolated pre-Columbian states
also I don't know much about smallpox but COVID definitely causes cumulative damage in the people it doesn't kill. It's unclear whether smallpox also did this.
I think covid wouldn't have been as bad in early centuries. The flow of people has always been constant, but the volume has increased in recent decades. Most cases on boats between Europe and America would have burned out before reaching their destination. Cities were also able to effect quarantine better. Plus, governments that aren't neoliberal are better equipped to handle any disease outbreak.