To put this into perspective, China's high-speed rail project in Indonesia connecting Jakarta and Bandung (a distance of 143 km) at a speed of 350 km/h was completed in just four months at total cost of $7.3 billion.

This line has seen an impressive number of passengers, with approximately 2 million people utilizing the service.

  • ClimateChangeAnxiety [he/him, they/them]
    ·
    4 months ago

    Still worth it in the country with a military budget over 8 times that but ffs there’s no reason that should cost more than 10% of what it does

    In other countries inflating the costs of public works to hand over money to private interests is called “corruption,” what’s it called here?

    • Owl [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      what’s it called here?

      High labor costs due to too many unions, usually.

      (This is a lie: the US has lower labor costs and union participation than other countries that have trains. But it's the answer I see most.)

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]
      ·
      4 months ago

      I agree that if $100 billion is going to be wasted regardless, I would rather have SOME of that money go towards high speed rail and the rest go to oligarchs’ pockets, rather than 60% of it going to weapons and 40% of it going to oligarchs’ pockets.