An-caps. Rationally, they're mostly harmless and insignificant. If anything, they really need to be protected from themselves, because whenever they try to put their ideas into practice they end up getting mauled by bears or crossing a cartel and getting shot or some shit, because they just have no idea of how the world works on a fundamental level. But I spent too much time arguing with them and started to really despise them, especially the way they twist and distort the meanings of words and say the most ridiculous bullshit.
If someone shoots you, the reason it's bad is because they vandalized your property, specifically, your body. A sit-in is an example of violent protest because you're violating property rights. Stabbing someone through the heart in self defense is not violent, because it was justified and "by definition" it's impossible for something to be both violent and justified. If a sailor saves a drowning man on the condition that he serves him for free for the rest of his life, that's a totally voluntary agreement that was in no way coerced, it's not slavery and the sailor is fully justified in making that demand, but if the drowning man later tells him to shove it, he's in the wrong for violating the agreement. Bosses should be able to trade promotions for sexual favors, because if you don't like it you can just work somewhere else. SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP
I think part of the problem is that online you don't know the age of the person you're arguing with, and when I used to engaged with them I defaulted to treating them as peers, and then I'd get frustrated that they didn't understand things that anyone with any life experience would understand. Like in retrospect I was probably just cussing out teenagers half the time lmao.
An-caps. Rationally, they're mostly harmless and insignificant. If anything, they really need to be protected from themselves, because whenever they try to put their ideas into practice they end up getting mauled by bears or crossing a cartel and getting shot or some shit, because they just have no idea of how the world works on a fundamental level. But I spent too much time arguing with them and started to really despise them, especially the way they twist and distort the meanings of words and say the most ridiculous bullshit.
If someone shoots you, the reason it's bad is because they vandalized your property, specifically, your body. A sit-in is an example of violent protest because you're violating property rights. Stabbing someone through the heart in self defense is not violent, because it was justified and "by definition" it's impossible for something to be both violent and justified. If a sailor saves a drowning man on the condition that he serves him for free for the rest of his life, that's a totally voluntary agreement that was in no way coerced, it's not slavery and the sailor is fully justified in making that demand, but if the drowning man later tells him to shove it, he's in the wrong for violating the agreement. Bosses should be able to trade promotions for sexual favors, because if you don't like it you can just work somewhere else. SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP SHUT UP
deleted by creator
I think part of the problem is that online you don't know the age of the person you're arguing with, and when I used to engaged with them I defaulted to treating them as peers, and then I'd get frustrated that they didn't understand things that anyone with any life experience would understand. Like in retrospect I was probably just cussing out teenagers half the time lmao.
deleted by creator