We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
We've all heard the liberal argument "if there is a candidate only 99% as bad then you're morally obligated to vote for 99% Hitler." But when we extend that logic to a nearly identical scenario it suddenly sounds a lot less compelling.
I mean, it's just dishonest. They don't believe it themselves, it's just a rhetorical tool. Liberals have only adopted that line of argument so they can shame anyone with principles into voting for Biden. If they did believe that 99% Hitler is worth supporting over 100% Hitler, why do they whine so much about Stalin?
Because they believe Stalin was worse than Hitler.
Then they should put their nuts on the table and admit they're hitlerites.![hitler-detector hitler-detector](https://www.hexbear.net/pictrs/image/a7e53fbd-6df2-4a41-b261-434cb7c73535.png)
Is that how you're supposed to identify Nazis?
Oh, man, I've been going about this all wrong. Thanks!
They disagree on the fundamental principle that Biden is 99% Hitler.
Haven't you seen /r/WhatBidenHasDone tankies?![smuglord smuglord](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/97a4a756-428f-4517-846a-1c810805ad28.png)