I mean, the implication of the tweet is that the secret service is not refuting the bad testimony of that aid (after they suggested that they would testify and refute it), not that the secret service is failing to come through with testimony against mr orange.
Obviously nothing will come of this, but this post is a pretty pre mature dunk attempt imo.
I mean, the implication of the tweet is that the secret service is not refuting the bad testimony of that aid (after they suggested that they would testify and refute it), not that the secret service is failing to come through with testimony against mr orange. Obviously nothing will come of this, but this post is a pretty pre mature dunk attempt imo.
The point I took from it is that the praetorian gaurd are clearly compromised