The current state must be changed, but not destroyed...
Once the bourgeois no longer have control of society the society doesn’t have to change any further...
I'm not sure that either of those things work that way, tbh.
To be in conflict with Capitalism is to be in conflict with the Bourgeois State; to refuse to destroy an opponent in conflict is to ensure one's own defeat.
The removal of the ruling class from power necessarily opens the proverbial floodgates to waves of social change such that the resulting society may not look at all like the one which preceded it.
I'm not sure that either of those things work that way, tbh.
To be in conflict with Capitalism is to be in conflict with the Bourgeois State; to refuse to destroy an opponent in conflict is to ensure one's own defeat.
The removal of the ruling class from power necessarily opens the proverbial floodgates to waves of social change such that the resulting society may not look at all like the one which preceded it.
When I say "the state" I mean it's apparatuses and such. Definitely not the people who ran it into the ground in the first place.
I don't think the structures themselves are awful, but bourgeois influence certainly is.