https://twitter.com/War_Takes/status/1546579298508750852?cxt=HHwWiICyibHrxvYqAAAA
The Rhodesia episode itself was good, but then I went through his tweets. of course he omits the NATO proxy war when discussing ukraine (framing it purely as a russian invasion that happened for no reason) in addition he had this lovely drivel where he responded to Luna Oi, saying she's "Denying the agency" of people in countries like Vietnam (her home) for noticing how often the US backs color revolutions. He's also quote tweeting himself while claiming "tankies" called him a "cuck" and presenting no evidence anyone said any of those things.
After this guy, and AdamSomething, I'm waiting for them to bring Vaush on and start complaining about "tankies" every episode. I'm starting to think the entire "Nate Bethea" produced podcast circuit: WTYP, Trash Future, Lions Led By Donkeys, 10K Losses, etc. is just social imperialist drivel. Nate Bethea and Joe Kasabian are both vets of the US invasion of Afghanistan (not conscripts, but actual fucking volunteers who fell for imperialist propaganda and now feel or pretend to feel some guilt about it) , and wouldn't you know it, every podcast Nate Bethea produces tows a tepid "both sides are always equally bad" line with regards to US imperialism. Joe Kasabian in particularly loves to play up Soviet atrocities with western sources like Montefiore and Snyder. Weird. Getting very disappointed in this shit. Chapo-adjacent pods, for all their faults, aren't nearly this bad when it comes to US imperialism.
Getting real tired of this line I see increasingly in media: Pointing out US hegemonic involvement is "denial of the people's agency". If you point out the US's specific involvement in this or that coup, this or that color revolution, this or that forced loan, this or that diplomatic pressure, no matter how specific you get, or how well-documented your sources, you get accused by liberals of "believing everything ever is the USA's fault." They apply a false broadness of scope to the specific historical point to discredit it.
whoever came up with the "denying agency" line must have gotten a raise at the State Department
deserves a whole book about it. or at least a :citations-needed: episode
like early this year with the Kazakhstan protests, like it could have been a color revolution, but it's doesn't have to be just because Vladimir Putin said it was, a lot more information than is available is needed, and, the people had legitimate grievances with the regime
I think people have an itchy trigger finger throwing out color revolution and :cia: (admittedly it's not a bad guess in most cases ), but, a lot of the time it's really hard to tell unless you're actually in the country/ there is a ton of reporting / or you speak the language, bc in a lot of these countries material conditions are so bad that a massive regime change demanding protest can come organically out of pretty much nowhere ie Sri Lanka
(but the phrase denying agency is libshit )
deleted by creator
What was that one trot newspaper that said South Vietnam had the right of self determination?
:fidel-wut: