Permanently Deleted

    • Whatami [none/use name]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They had a war over it. It's just that it happened at the same time as the Cuban Missile Crisis, so it has been forgotten by the Western mind.

      India and China certainly haven't, though. Good thing they're separated by the Himalayas. Those mountains are like a gigantic wall that keeps the two giants from invading each other. It is just impossible to do any kind of military logistics with the world's highest mountains in the way.

      • eduardog3000 [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Good thing they’re separated by the Himalayas. Those mountains are like a gigantic wall that keeps the two giants from invading each other. It is just impossible to do any kind of military logistics with the world’s highest mountains in the way.

        What side of the Himalayas is Aksai Chin on? Because that's who should own it.

        • CanYouFeelItMrKrabs [any, he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Are you saying that because it would be practically difficult to maintain control of territory on the other side of the Himalayas?

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      More broadly, what's the leftist position on what gives a group a legitimate claim to territory?

      • machiabelly [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I'd say stability is a big piece. If the ROC moved into some of these territories there would be war and even if they won there would be people left over within those territories who would be willing to fight to change it back. If the change of territory doesn't lead to more war, or even reduces the chance of future war then I'd be more ok with it.

        The people who live there, their conditions and what the competing countries have been proven to provide. Like, there could be a situation where it might piss off nationalists but a change in ownership could improve quality of life for the people there. Obviously the popular opinion bit is important to. Consent to governance is important.

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          I think that's a good place to start, but what about colonized/invaded/displaced groups?

            • Sen_Jen [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              the consent of those who are left

              See by that logic, the most brutally colonized places like the Americas and Australia have legitimate claims to the lands they occupy and don't have to give concessions to the natives. I know you're not trying to say that, but it's the conclusion of that argument.

              Fun fact: Northern Ireland was purposely gerrymandered in such a way to have a Protestant British majority without being a tiny unviable microstate. The North is also referred to as the 6 counties, but there are 9 counties in the province of Ulster: 6 in Northern Ireland, 3 in the Republic. The borders were drawn by the British so that in the event of, say, a referendum on the reunification of Ireland, the British colonisers would outnumber the native Irish