Seems valid

  • FugaziArchivist [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    so for real: How does he have followers and defenders? Do they just willfully ignore everything he says about underage kids? Or do they acknowledge but think it's not a problem? I don't understand.

      • MiraculousMM [he/him, any]M
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        So much of the shittiest, most banal content on the internet can be explained by this. Bored impressionable children consume soooooo much content and are a gigantic demographic for anyone looking to be internet famous

    • eXAt [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      “That was out of context, go back and actually engage with the relevant content (4000+ hours) if you are willing to discuss this In good faith”

    • A_Serbian_Milf [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      They have debated themselves into the position with facts and logic to prove some kind of devil’s advocate point, they are just contrarian children and think it’s edgy and funny to rhetorically justify pedophilia

      • Nagarjuna [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I'm gonna post one hell of a take here. Past a certain point (a fairly high point, to be fair), treats don't make you happier. Do phones, cars and computers make you happier? The living standards of coastal Americans could dramatically fall and just the improvement in agency and community socialism entails would still make a lot of people happier than they are now.

    • Aryuproudomenowdaddy [comrade/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I've had some claim that he never threatened to rape a girl who repeatedly turned down his advances, or if he did he sorta apologized for it so it's fine now.