• jack [he/him, comrade/them]
    ·
    8 months ago

    https://1804books.com/products/chinas-revolution-and-the-quest-for-a-socialist-future

    Read this a month or two ago. It's a good, brief overview of the subject and explicitly a defense of China as a socialist project.

    • RedCheer@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      8 months ago

      This author is also part of a new four part podcast series on Guerrilla History:

      https://guerrillahistory.libsyn.com/the-taiping-boxer-rebellions-w-ken-hammond-modern-chinese-history-pt-1

  • Juice [none/use name]
    ·
    8 months ago

    My book club reads this one https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/writers/isaacs/1938/tcr/index.htm Note: its depressing af

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]
      ·
      8 months ago

      Note: its depressing af

      It's written by a Trot, so of course it is, anything that succeeds must be denounced.

      • Juice [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I didn't realize this was controversial. Are you intending to educate with a sufficiently sourced counter narrative, or are you trying to appear as a wretched, intellectually dishonest sectarian? At this moment I see a lot from the second category and nothing from the first.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          8 months ago

          I didn't think you'd take it quite so gravely. It looks like it's fine enough when it's not talking about trot factions, where is conspicuously takes up much more florid language to describe the eternal tragedy of victimized trots, as is tradition.

          • Juice [none/use name]
            ·
            8 months ago

            I asked for education, I got whatever weird non-marxist trip you are on.

            Looking at your post history, I noticed this: https://hexbear.net/comment/4750389

            If you weren't such a goofball, you'd have heard of uneven and combined development. Sectarian is the opposite of revolutionary.