Agreed. I’d also like to see some sort of system to give countries with higher population a bigger say, but I don’t know how to strike that balance because you don’t want the huge countries just completely overshadowing the tiny ones, but also China should definitely have more say in things than Luxembourg
I don't know if you would get participation out of all of them if they weren't all equal. Of course they're not all equal because of the veto but you get the point. A nation is a nation and one nation gets the say of one nation.
What your envisaging is more of a international people's congress. This would be representative of people rather than nations and I totally agree with aiming to achieve that. It is what I imagine would occur after achieving global socialism, organisations imagined around states and nations would give way to organisations built instead for the international people.
Agreed. I’d also like to see some sort of system to give countries with higher population a bigger say, but I don’t know how to strike that balance because you don’t want the huge countries just completely overshadowing the tiny ones, but also China should definitely have more say in things than Luxembourg
I don't know if you would get participation out of all of them if they weren't all equal. Of course they're not all equal because of the veto but you get the point. A nation is a nation and one nation gets the say of one nation.
What your envisaging is more of a international people's congress. This would be representative of people rather than nations and I totally agree with aiming to achieve that. It is what I imagine would occur after achieving global socialism, organisations imagined around states and nations would give way to organisations built instead for the international people.