I am fascinated by the idea of "the underlying sociological and cultural factors" that go into the way a sociocultural group engages in the task of engineering (within this context: the scientific approach to problem-solving).

I realize this is a poor explanation, but an example of the phenomenon should be able to clarify what I attempt to describe. The underlying structure of the thought process behind how the Russian conception of war resulted in divergent, yet ultimately superior tank design. The cultural influence on the way tools that fill a universal need are themselves constructed. Like how western saws cut on the pushstroke, but eastern ones on the pullstroke. the saw is almost the same, and exists to serve a shared need for a tool. yet the simplest thing diverges completely.

  • jabrd [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Just the expected battlefield geography changed the tank design. Soviet tanks wide and flat for tiny silhouettes with shit gun depression because they’d be fighting in the wide terrain of Eastern Europe. American/NATO tanks have great gun depression and reverse speeds because there was an expectation of shooting over and using cover in hilly western europe