This dumb motherfucker needs to stop using pseudo science to back up his reactionary views. Stop trying to use a "Marxist" analysis to show that gay people with DINK status are oppressing the straights and are bourgeois because a sample size of 900 made 10% more on average than a sample size of 1.2 million straights.
Does he have nothing better to do? Is this his big stand? Is this the leftist :peterson-pill-dinner: ?
The first one is okay (not that over 50k wasn't exploited, that's dumb, but anyone over that didn't experience the brunt of national exploitation), but the rest are fucking unhinged weirdo shit
The second one largely seems true in my opinion. Marriage is a pretty conservative (status quo) construct and trying to expand it to more people reminds me a bit of the social democrats in the US who want everyone to have healthcare, but at the expense of the global south. It's people going "why won't you accept me as a valued member of your evil empire? I want a piece of the pie too." But I guess because the average American doesn't know anything or care about how the US really operates, that would make most political struggles in the US conservative. Maybe that's just the mood I'm in. Demanding more rights for people living in (and maintaining) the place that is actively removing rights for most of the world's population.
The present chairman is Distinguished Professor Enfu Cheng, director of the Center of Economic and Social Development, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.
CHINA GET YOUR MAN! WHY WRE YOU ALLOWING THIS DRIVEL TO BE PUBLISHED?