• MattsAlt [comrade/them]
      ·
      9 months ago

      So Cuba should dissolve a government widely approved of by the people and return to client state gang run institutions for the ability to receive food? You're a fucking idiot. Calling people sith lords, please learn to engage in world politics by using meaningful vocabulary instead of trying to equate everything to your favorite work of fiction

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          It shouldn't be hard to understand that what the US cares about are the rights of capital and of empire, not human rights

        • LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          Hard to tell how popular the government is if you get jailed for voicing disagreement now isn't it?

          good thing that doesn't happen then, huh?

          • BeamBrain [he/him]
            ·
            9 months ago

            No, you see, Display name@feddit.nu is the one true interpreter of the desires of all people. We should just let them pick every government since clearly they know best.

        • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Hard to tell how popular the government is if you get jailed for voicing disagreement now isn’t it?

          [citation needed]

          What I’ve seen about the demand for the sanctions to be lifted it’s granting the population human rights regarding political freedoms. Would that mean the dissolvement of the government?

          You've been given a link to a declassified CIA document in which they admit that the true objective of the sanctions is to have the Cuben government overthrown, did you read anything any of us have given you?

          • MeowZedong@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            9 months ago

            ...did you read anything any of us have given you?

            Lol, you know liberals choose not to read. I'd poke fun by saying they can't read, but that would be giving them too much credit.

    • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
      ·
      9 months ago

      You're going to bat for the collective punishment of the Cuban people. When is the collective punishment of civilians appropriate in your mind?

      You're also supporting a policy that has failed to achieve its stated result for 65 years. What other long-term policy failures do you support?

        • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please cite me where I state that I support this policy?

          You excused it by blaming it on Cuba. There's no meaningful difference between that and support. Any worthwhile take on the embargo starts with ending it immediately, and you can't even manage that.

          And sure, I would support sanctions against Nazi Germany. But until Cuba turns fascist, invades its neighbors, and starts a genocide, it's nowhere near a situation where sanctions are appropriate.

            • 420blazeit69 [he/him]
              ·
              9 months ago

              Use your words

              If you think there's some meaningful difference, let's hear what it is. "I don't support this but it's totally their fault" is not convincing.

            • Kumikommunism [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              9 months ago

              Are you a sith lord?

              Well, if your horrible, uneducated, moronic, murderous political ideas didn't already tell me that you have the mental capacity of someone who derives their political opinions from children's media...There it is.

        • GarbageShoot [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          Please cite me where I state that I support this policy?

          I hate when people try to be slick, and it's even more annoying when they suck at it:

          Well it's a one party dictatorship, and . . . the responsibility lies on the Cuban leadership.

          All this ignoring that you are misrepresenting both Cuba and the effect of the sanctions.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              ·
              9 months ago

              "It's a Bad Country and the actions taken against it by the US are the fault of the Bad Country's leadership, not the US"

              "Oh, but I'm not supporting the US, merely absolving them of guilt"

              Chickenshit nonsense

            • keepcarrot [she/her]
              ·
              9 months ago

              Makes pretty extreme implication

              Denies any such implication and is insulted that anyone could read it such a way

              ???

              Coward

        • ExotiqueMatter@lemmygrad.ml
          ·
          9 months ago

          You do realize that kind of sanctions affect the poor civilians far more than the elite, if it even affect the elite at all, right?

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      ·
      9 months ago

      How is the US engaging in a blockade around a country with a popular government the fault of the Cuban leadership?

    • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Well it’s a one party dictatorship

      Yes, the dictatorship of the party of the working class, or in other words a proletarian democracy.

      Meanwhile, whether one party or two or a hundred, we have a dictatorship of the capitalist class, or in other words a bourgeois democracy.

    • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Yeah they should've had a dictatorship of two genocidal imperialist parties instead like the US

    • plinky [he/him]
      ·
      9 months ago

      On being sanctioned as terrorist country? are you for fucking real?

        • plinky [he/him]
          ·
          9 months ago

          I guess you could call george floyd or la riots stomping a terrorist act thonk

          but for real, islands can't survive on their own, if tomorrow uk stopped all trade, it will start starving in 2 months. usa sanctions are extra cruel with both finance and shipping conditions

            • я не из калининграда@lemmy.ml
              ·
              9 months ago

              cuba and korea are already democratic, as in the sense of true democracy, workplace democracy. liberal "democracy" is nothing more than a cover for the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie and foreign imperialists. just look at cuba and korea under their respective american and japanese occupations. thats what the liberal west wants to return them to.

            • plinky [he/him]
              ·
              9 months ago

              like how usa sanctions saudia arabia or uae or qatar or azerbaijan or japan over not moving towards democracy?

                • plinky [he/him]
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  9 months ago

                  Cause japan is one party state?

                  Submit or else, good to see gunboat diplomacy is a thing of the past

                • davel [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  Yes they can easily have the sanctions lifted by betraying the people of Cuba and allowing Global North neocolonizers to resume their pillaging of the nation.

                  What a dumbass turbolib.

            • GarbageShoot [he/him]
              ·
              9 months ago

              However what is important to remember is that the sanctions are imposed based on the regimes actions against it's population

              I don't know every single sanction against the DPRK, but over the last 40 years the sanctions have all been in connection to nuclear development and things like that. Also, it's rich that you talk about communists being hypocrites while you take western powers at their word for why they are imposing sanctions that starve people by your own admission. The US has done and is doing much crueler things to the people of these states than the states themselves have ever done in any but the most unhinged fantasies.

    • frippa@lemmy.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The communist party in Cuba (like every other party) can't "advertise" itself, it's in the constitution ffs. If you wanted to pick a socialist country to portray as a "one party scary dictatorship" Cuba is the least fit. Cuba is a zero-party democracy in a way.

    • keepcarrot [she/her]
      ·
      9 months ago

      Most countries are actually fine with political parties on the ballot receiving funding, material/technical support, and terrorist attacks from a foreign power, it's just the perfidious Cubans banning other parties that do this!

    • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
      ·
      9 months ago

      Obvious troll is obvious. If the overwhelming number of Cuban people really and truly didn't support socialism. Then they would have taken over in a new revolution as they did getting rid of the US puppet state the last time. They have stood firm despite the literal attempts of US lead colour revolutions and refuse to be forced to bow to the self-appointed global police state that is the US. They aren't the ones that should change to serve the rich fucks that steal from nations across the world. It is those rich fucks that should be put in the dirt so that peoples across the world could live their lives without fear.