He absolutely is not. The only contribution he made is being so audaciously wrong that people felt motivated to do science to prove how full of shit he was.
Like in a thread, when someone says something outrageously wrong, gets banned and deleted and there are multiple long responses decisively refuting what he said.
He absolutely is not. The only contribution he made is being so audaciously wrong that people felt motivated to do science to prove how full of shit he was.
Same with Chomsky in linguistics lol
That's why he was so valuable.
Like in a thread, when someone says something outrageously wrong, gets banned and deleted and there are multiple long responses decisively refuting what he said.