extra pathetic considering the absolute state of britains military
does a single brit not in the army know a single general or admiral? in love with the idea of military rule to the exclusion of the reality of that military as a fading, emaciated vestige
It's the most potent in Europe. They just completed a supercarrier.
Compare this to the rest of Europe, where their carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, isn't super and has had a propeller fall off as it tried to leave port.
Everyone has a smaller navy than they did in the 80s.
The British military is one of the biggest and best in Europe. It's really weird saying they're some kind of national wimps like Italy or Belgium. They are hardly fading nor vestigial.
i wouldnt say any euro military is necessarily national wimps, just very US-reliant and not very prestigious, especially compared to their imperial pasts. wanting a military rule in europe is like wanting to be a US colony
extra pathetic considering the absolute state of britains military
does a single brit not in the army know a single general or admiral? in love with the idea of military rule to the exclusion of the reality of that military as a fading, emaciated vestige
It's the most potent in Europe. They just completed a supercarrier.
Compare this to the rest of Europe, where their carrier, the Charles de Gaulle, isn't super and has had a propeller fall off as it tried to leave port.
the british have a smaller navy than they did in the 80s and even then needed US logistical support to beat up Argentina
Everyone has a smaller navy than they did in the 80s.
The British military is one of the biggest and best in Europe. It's really weird saying they're some kind of national wimps like Italy or Belgium. They are hardly fading nor vestigial.
i wouldnt say any euro military is necessarily national wimps, just very US-reliant and not very prestigious, especially compared to their imperial pasts. wanting a military rule in europe is like wanting to be a US colony