It wasn't that bad in Goldeneye. Everyone in that game has the reactions of molasses so it's pretty fair. Also n64 only had 1 stick - everything else was digital inputs.
I mean that's kinda just how games work. Like my dad sucks at FPS games entirely because he never played them, that doesn't mean the format is necessarily bad. I'm not saying Goldeneye controls are ideal or anything obviously, but they were probably the best option for the controller. A more fair experiment would be to have them each individually play singleplayer, since the game was designed there to accommodate players playing the style of game for the first time.
everyone was my age and remembered playing goldeneye as a kid but as soon as we started playing everyone was like "oh my god these controls suck, i can't go back to this". I'm inclined to agree. FPSs were relatively new in the 90s and the kinks hadn't been worked out. And the N64 controller is just so rude on the hands lol
I kinda have the perspective that almost all console controls for first person games are deeply flawed, since I've been a PC gamer for so long. I really have to put it into the context of "Well what was the best option for this game? Could it have been made differently?" I think a really good console shooter that worked with those limitations would be something like Metroid Prime, where pure accuracy is only a small part of the focus. It played to the strengths of sticks rather than the weaknesses.
almost all console controls for first person games are deeply flawed, since I’ve been a PC gamer for so long
yeah, PC is superior in general, but that's why i also brought up daggerfall. the original daggerfall has awful tank controls that need to be changed significantly before it feels playable.
Yeah I ain't contradicting you there lol. Controllers are good for plenty of types of games, don't get me wrong - keyboard and mouse isn't always a superior option. It's great for manage-y type games and anything that focuses on precision cursor placement, but many other types of games are really better on controller, like fighting games or platformers.
left stick is walk forward/backward and turn left/right, right stick is strafe left/right and look up/down
My first experience playing FPSes was with games like Blake Stone and the original doom games, I also used the arrow keys and no mouse; When I finally played games that expected you to use WASD, and strafed instead of turned, and to use the mouse, I blanched and switched it back to old doom controls, lol.
Yeah, I remember the first Dark Forces using Pg up/dn for orientation because mouselook wasn't a thing till Quake 1 (or Marathon for the 3 people who played it).
I cannot even concieve of another movement layout on a two-stick controller
in the 90s there were hideous variations of what we call "tank controls" exemplified by games like Daggerfall (PC) and Goldeneye (N64)
It wasn't that bad in Goldeneye. Everyone in that game has the reactions of molasses so it's pretty fair. Also n64 only had 1 stick - everything else was digital inputs.
i tried replaying multiplayer like a year ago. super jank. nobody had fun but me. I wiped the floor with everyone out of muscle memory lol
I mean that's kinda just how games work. Like my dad sucks at FPS games entirely because he never played them, that doesn't mean the format is necessarily bad. I'm not saying Goldeneye controls are ideal or anything obviously, but they were probably the best option for the controller. A more fair experiment would be to have them each individually play singleplayer, since the game was designed there to accommodate players playing the style of game for the first time.
everyone was my age and remembered playing goldeneye as a kid but as soon as we started playing everyone was like "oh my god these controls suck, i can't go back to this". I'm inclined to agree. FPSs were relatively new in the 90s and the kinks hadn't been worked out. And the N64 controller is just so rude on the hands lol
I kinda have the perspective that almost all console controls for first person games are deeply flawed, since I've been a PC gamer for so long. I really have to put it into the context of "Well what was the best option for this game? Could it have been made differently?" I think a really good console shooter that worked with those limitations would be something like Metroid Prime, where pure accuracy is only a small part of the focus. It played to the strengths of sticks rather than the weaknesses.
yeah, PC is superior in general, but that's why i also brought up daggerfall. the original daggerfall has awful tank controls that need to be changed significantly before it feels playable.
Yeah I ain't contradicting you there lol. Controllers are good for plenty of types of games, don't get me wrong - keyboard and mouse isn't always a superior option. It's great for manage-y type games and anything that focuses on precision cursor placement, but many other types of games are really better on controller, like fighting games or platformers.
The trick is to do 1 vs 1 and use the 2 controller method.
Think N64: left stick is walk forward/backward and turn left/right, right stick is strafe left/right and look up/down
Bleg
Yeah that's awful
Eh, when you're used to it you're used to it
My first experience playing FPSes was with games like Blake Stone and the original doom games, I also used the arrow keys and no mouse; When I finally played games that expected you to use WASD, and strafed instead of turned, and to use the mouse, I blanched and switched it back to old doom controls, lol.
Yeah, I remember the first Dark Forces using Pg up/dn for orientation because mouselook wasn't a thing till Quake 1 (or Marathon for the 3 people who played it).