October 3rd's update is here! TLDR? Here's the summary.

October 4th's update is here! TLDR? Here's the summary.

Just a heads up - I'm doing more prep on Wednesday as I'll be moving in the near-to-mid future, so it'll be a four-update week.

October 7th's update is here! TLDR? Here's the summary.

October 8th's update is here! TLDR? [Here's the summary.

Next thread here!

Links and Stuff

Want to contribute?

RSS Feed

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists, for the “buh Zeleski is a jew?!?!” people.

Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Add to the above list if you can, thank you.


Resources For Understanding The War Beyond The Bulletins


Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map, who is an independent youtuber with a mostly neutral viewpoint.

Moon of Alabama, which tends to have good analysis (though also a couple bad takes here and there)

Understanding War and the Saker: neo-conservative sources but their reporting of the war (so far) seems to line up with reality better than most liberal sources.

Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict and, unlike most western analysts, has some degree of understanding on how war works. He is a reactionary, however.

On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent journalist reporting in the Ukrainian warzones.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.


Telegram Channels

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

Pro-Russian

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.

https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ Gleb Bazov, banned from Twitter, referenced pretty heavily in what remains of pro-Russian Twitter.

https://t.me/asbmil ~ ASB Military News, banned from Twitter.

https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.

https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday Patrick Lancaster - crowd-funded U.S journalist, mostly pro-Russian, works on the ground near warzones to report news and talk to locals.

https://t.me/riafan_everywhere ~ Think it's a government news org or Federal News Agency? Russian language.

https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ Front news coverage. Russian langauge.

https://t.me/rybar ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.

https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense.

https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine

With the entire western media sphere being overwhelming pro-Ukraine already, you shouldn't really need more, but:

https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.

https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


Last week's discussion post.


  • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
    hexagon
    M
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Looks like the Russian retreat from northern Kherson oblast has done much to stabilize the front there, but Ukraine remains desperate for results. The rains and the mud are also posing a barrier to advances. Could go either way.

    Meanwhile, Ukraine could soon attack on the Zaporozhye front, which has been accumulating troops and equipment for the last month, maybe two. Ukraine has put much deception and secrecy into this, though the Russian information gathering appears to have overcome it. It appears to be a major site to watch in the next few days and weeks. Again, I don't know which side will falter here, but given Russia's decency to retreat at the first sign of trouble, it seems very plausible we could see a similar Ukrainian advance here and let the Russian elastic defence strategy work its magic. Hopefully they're evacuating everybody out of the area.

    Ukraine has been losing incredible amounts of men and equipment, and what the Pentagon is giving them - or at least claiming to give them - is almost a hilariously tiny amount at this point. In contrast, Russia's decency to retreat before Ukraine can form cauldrons around them means that they are receiving few losses in men and equipment. Apparently up near Kherson, the Russians lost only a couple broken trucks.

    My thinking, and the thinking of various commentators, is that Ukraine and the West knows that they cannot win militarily, and so are trying to win by other means. These offensives are not strategically oriented - Ukrainian reserves are being pulled from the important area of the Donetsk front, especially near Bakhmut, and instead put into other fronts. These offensives are instead trying to cause tactical victories for Ukraine - no matter the cost - that look bad for the Russian government, and Putin himself. Kherson City is kind of the crown jewel here, but we've also seen inordinate resources put in to capture places like Lyman, which are of no particular military purpose.

    Zelensky's decree that he would never make peace with Putin was worded that way for a reason. He did not say he'd never make peace with Russia. What Zelensky is trying to do is cause a revolt in the upper ranks of the Russian government, or perhaps the oligarchs who have suffered from the sanctions, to get Putin out of government. Ukraine and the West cannot win the war militarily, and so are attempting to win it through other means, like regime change. Apparently - I haven't been reading them - western media is increasingly drawing from despondent Russian sources rather than their traditional Ukrainian sources, as a way of displaying how "badly" this war is going for Russia, and create panic, and thus anger, among anybody sympathetic to the West that is still in Russia.

    The end result of this desperation by the West and Ukraine may be false flag nuclear strikes on Ukraine, in order to try and create divisions between Russia and their geopolitical allies. Let's all hope this war ends before they get that desperate.

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Ukraine has put much deception and secrecy into this

      How is that possible with modern satellite recon being what it is? I'd think the Russians can just watch them doing whatever they're doing?

      • SeventyTwoTrillion [he/him]
        hexagon
        M
        ·
        2 years ago

        Sure, but that means you're constantly reacting to movements and you have a delay, as they get to areas first and only then do you send soldiers in to respond.

        In practice, you'd wanna access the enemy's communications, so when they say "Okay, we're going to put 200 soldiers and 10 tanks at this village tomorrow at 2pm", you can then adequately respond to that in time. The problem is when the enemy knows that you're accessing their communications, as Ukraine surely knows. Then, they could again say the above, but perhaps the commander in charge of the group of soldiers has a slip of paper given to them weeks ago that has their orders and is told not to obey what is said over the radio unless a certain codeword is used, which could be as innocuous as saying "battle" instead of "fight". Then it becomes considerably more difficult to work out exactly what's going on.