hexaflexagonbear [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agoGoing pro-Bolsonaro is insane even for Glenn's heel-turnimagemessage-square48 fedilinkarrow-up188
arrow-up188imageGoing pro-Bolsonaro is insane even for Glenn's heel-turnhexaflexagonbear [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 2 years agomessage-square48 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareHumanBehaviorByBjork [any, undecided]hexbear20·edit-22 years agoLol, the Economist isn't attacking right wing populism, they're dropping their support for an obvious loser to support a winner they know will be constrained in his actions, and trying to make sure he knows it link
minus-squarezifnab25 [he/him, any]hexbear1·edit-22 years agoNo no no. The editors of The Economist are simply afraid of the right wing populist message of the anti-rain forest guy who shits out his nose. All the real Lenin heads know that Economist is bad. So, therefore, by the opposite day logic of Hegel's dianetics, that means Bolsonaro is good. This is just science. You can't argue with it. link
Lol, the Economist isn't attacking right wing populism, they're dropping their support for an obvious loser to support a winner they know will be constrained in his actions, and trying to make sure he knows it
No no no. The editors of The Economist are simply afraid of the right wing populist message of the anti-rain forest guy who shits out his nose.
All the real Lenin heads know that Economist is bad. So, therefore, by the opposite day logic of Hegel's dianetics, that means Bolsonaro is good.
This is just science. You can't argue with it.