Isn't that just ignoring the fact that different bourgeois factions (or even specific individuals within a faction) can be more or less conciliatory or more or less repressive than other bourgeois factions? A given liberal faction may refuse concessions even when faced with an armed and organized labor movement, while another may try to preempt such a mobilization by giving milder concessions sooner. Both are forced, but react differently to different degrees of force.
Isn't that just ignoring the fact that different bourgeois factions (or even specific individuals within a faction) can be more or less conciliatory or more or less repressive than other bourgeois factions? A given liberal faction may refuse concessions even when faced with an armed and organized labor movement, while another may try to preempt such a mobilization by giving milder concessions sooner. Both are forced, but react differently to different degrees of force.
deleted by creator
i want to party with whatever sickos were butt-chugging that much ideology
the CIA was full of Mormons back then, not exactly great party material
Yes but also the NLRB is shit and these libs are trying to polish a turd. Don't even give them that much.
But what causes a certain faction to be more or less conciliatory?