Permanently Deleted

  • Frank [he/him, he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    They were terrible books, but I've never had any reason to dislike Chris Paolini personally. It's okay for people to like terrible books, even if they're heavily influenced by marketing. I think even Paolini has expressed embarrassment about Eragon in recent years.

    It's admittedly been... uh... probably like 15 or 20 years since I read them, but I don't remember Eragon being as perniciously mean spirited and shitty as Harry Potter. It had a lot of problems, but those were mostly problems of a young, very inexperienced writer rather than anything actively or passively malicious.

      • UlyssesT
        hexagon
        ·
        edit-2
        17 days ago

        deleted by creator

      • Orannis62 [ze/hir]
        ·
        2 years ago

        IIRC that was kind of a marketting thing. He was like 15 when he started but he did the bulk of the writing when he was older (albeit still a teen, I'm pretty sure)

    • hahafuck [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is LeGuin's point though. Not that Harry Potter is un-PC or 'perniciously mean spirited and shitty' (funny thing to say about a book for children sorry), but that they are basic and derrivative, and in that Eragon was a far worse offender

      • Orannis62 [ze/hir]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean she did also call it that in another quote, linked upthread

        good fare for its age group, but stylistically ordinary, imaginatively derivative, and ethically rather mean-spirited.

        And I don't think that's a weird claim? HP does this thing where, when a character's bad, it becomes ok just say absolutely viscious things about them, usually about their weight or about how "mannish" they are

        • hahafuck [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh true yeah Crab and Goyle and all that. Pretty rotten treatment. Eragon is sooo bad though is my thing

          • Orannis62 [ze/hir]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Eragon is derivative crap, but it's not actively offensive. Like, Rita Skeeter alone as a veiled stereotype is so much worse than anything in Eragon

            • hahafuck [they/them]
              ·
              edit-2
              2 years ago

              Who was Skeeter supposed to be a stereotype of besides British tabloid reporters? Haven't read them since I was a baby, barely remember her

              • Orannis62 [ze/hir]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                She was frequently described as mannish, with large hands. And she lies about an aspect of her identity so she can spy on children.

                Given what we now know about Rowling, take a guess

                  • Orannis62 [ze/hir]
                    ·
                    2 years ago

                    Oh yeah the movies ironed out a LOT of this stuff. Like, the entire "Hermione discovers that there are house elves enslaved at Hogwarts and gets made fun of for trying to free them" subplot was basically removed from the movies entirely, and also the fact that werewolves are explicitly an AIDS allegory and most werewolves target children. It's disgusting garbage all the way down. Hollywood did SO much to launder Rowling's reptuation