The vote wasn't between using nukes and not using nukes.
This reads as insecure contrarianism needing to be validated. You're never getting a 'Oh lord I REPENT I should have voted for Trump or stayed home or shit, I dunno, voted for the libertarian third party candidate?? ALL I KNOW IS I DUN WRONG HELP ME" and even if you did, then what?
Pointing out that man behind the supposed "most progressive platform ever" is in fact just another shitty warmonger is not "insecure contrarianism" you nerd.
All you’re doing is being annoying.
Annoying smug libs is fun and cool and good. This whole comment reeks of :very-intelligent: energy.
:brainworms:
The vote wasn't between using nukes and not using nukes.
This reads as insecure contrarianism needing to be validated. You're never getting a 'Oh lord I REPENT I should have voted for Trump or stayed home or shit, I dunno, voted for the libertarian third party candidate?? ALL I KNOW IS I DUN WRONG HELP ME" and even if you did, then what?
All you're doing is being annoying.
Pointing out that man behind the supposed "most progressive platform ever" is in fact just another shitty warmonger is not "insecure contrarianism" you nerd.
Annoying smug libs is fun and cool and good. This whole comment reeks of :very-intelligent: energy.
Okay maybe I don't understand the guy we're making to get mad at because everybody I talked to knew about Iraq before voting
How is asking you to judge a decision based on the alternatives available at the time 'we live in society'? Can you explain your smell please?
:PIGPOOPBALLS: