Permanently Deleted

  • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Sure, but you left out Hillary in 2016 and Obama in 2008

    Points to Iowa for not nominating John Edwards, I guess. But both Hillary and Obama were the front-runners nationally long before the Iowa caucuses were decided.

    the 2020 result was too ambiguous and overshadowed by the disastrous result-gathering process

    Nothing was ambiguous about how badly Biden performed.

    More important is the fact that the political class views Iowa as a crucial state

    Iowa is important in so far as it demonstrates whether you have any meaningful base of support. I agree that sequential state voting is dumb and the caucus model is dumb and generally speaking Presidential politics is a fucking farce. But asking the basic question of whether you can do the physical act of politicking in a relatively small state is very meaningful. Kamala Harris basically failed to show up in Iowa and it illustrated her overall weakness as a national candidate. Michael Bloomberg skipped the state entirely, only to place a meager 4th in his states of primary focus.

    There's a lot of bullshit that goes on in Iowa, but one thing that isn't bullshit is proving you have the simple ability to organize a large group of people to show up in a single location and say "I want that guy to be my President".