So "it's a lot harder" is an acceptable reason to trade with objectively the most destructive nation to ever exist but not with its Middle Eastern outpost. Where does this line get drawn? Is it ok to trade with France, the rapist of Africa? What's the acceptable ratio of billions traded to millions murdered?
So "it's a lot harder" is an acceptable reason to trade with objectively the most destructive nation to ever exist but not with its Middle Eastern outpost. Where does this line get drawn? Is it ok to trade with France, the rapist of Africa? What's the acceptable ratio of billions traded to millions murdered?