GOP Senate hopefuls once dismissed as ‘fringe’ by elites are now in positions to win.

Republican outsiders written off by their own party leadership and considered easy pickings by Democrats have defied the odds to make their races highly competitive, with some now tipped to win.

Democrats were so confident that some of these candidates labeled "far-right" or "fringe" by the media wouldn't win that Democrat campaigns and outside groups actually funneled money to them, thinking they'd be easier opponents in a general election than Republican primary hopefuls deemed more moderate or part of the GOP establishment.

  • Wertheimer [any]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This article implies that the Democrats funded all of the fringe candidates they highlight, but that doesn't appear to be true. Here's a Washington Post article that actually lists dollar amounts . The only Senate candidate in this Just the News piece that appears to have received serious Democrat money is Bolduc, the New Hampshire guy. (Not Walker in Georgia, and not Masters in Arizona.) Most of the candidates the Dems funded lost.

    The Dems did help fund Mastriano in the Pennsylvania gubernatorial race, though, and he's one of the most dangerous people running this year.

    • cynesthesia
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      deleted by creator

      • Wertheimer [any]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I haven't found any info about direct money funneling, but the Democrats did intervene just before the primary vote by reminding everyone that Lake's opponent had previously donated to Democratic candidates.

        https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2022-election/trump-backed-kari-lake-gets-hand-unlikely-source-arizona-democrats-rcna38084

        Edit - National Review piece highlighting the ad says the Dems didn't fund Lake, but they add more details and context to that story. Lake was also a former Democrat, but the party didn't mention that part. https://archive.ph/aZEbt