Sure, i don't doubt that. I acknowledge what they have done up until now, what i wrote wasn't a value judgment either (or at least i didn't intend it as one, if it came across like that, sorry). I just wanted to show that the two ideologies have different (valid imo) standards of success, that, if projected over each other, always lead to sectarian dick measuring contests. Marxists want a robust state in order to protect themselves for prolonged periods. Anarchists, obviously, don't want that, they want the people to be able to protect themselves autonomously and whatnot. Both standards have their own successes, for Marxists it's China, for anarchists it's Exarcheia, it's community centers in Chile, it's long running mutual aid programs in the US.