I've been using AI to write my emails, and it's such a help. I still need to tweak each output a bit, but it's much easier to get started when HR just gives me the name of someone I've never met, says they're my new assignment leader, and tells me to write an email introducing myself to them. Anyway, the pieces Critical uses in the video aren't really that impressive. They make grammatical sense, but that's about it. an AI would actually need to make valid and insightful arguments to replace journalists, not just hurl claims and make things up.
a convincing AI that writes with typos and deliberate errors.
Spell check and grammar check programs have been an integrated part of word processing software for at least a decade or two now so good luck with that.
The idea of a single original writer with original ideas is absurdly outdated. Teachers used to tell us in the 90s "You can't use a calculator on the math test because you won't be able to use a calculator in college!". They used to make us write cursive and tell us that our papers wouldn't be accepted otherwise.
Well, now we've got calculators for writing, capable software that can automatically detect and correct spelling and grammar mistakes, and systems that can handle much of the routine elements of writing.
And we're still teaching students to write like it's 1160ad even though it's no longer possible to differentiate between bad freshman writing and algorithmic content, except by accusing students of being too coherent and legible in their writing.
And now people that make Pokémon games can’t even program a calculator and a person literally writing in English is defending the idea of not teaching people how to convey their ideas clearly in the written word. Which will impact their ability to speak extemporaneously because written and verbal competency are linked.
School is a prison but knowledge and learning are not punishment.
I could have explained myself better. We should be using the tools available to us now to help people write more effectively rather than treating all possible uses of these tools as inauthentic and invalid based on antiquated notions of "originality".
Instead of investigating how automation could make a better, more effective writer academia collectively decided that any form of software assistance is not merely looked down upon, but constitutes an actual intellectual crime.
While at the same time the costs and stakes a student faces in college have risen near infinitely, creating an incentive to cheat that borders on necessity.
School is more of a prison than ever, the punishment for failure is lifelong poverty, and professors and faculty still pretend that students are there to receive a liberal arts education to better themselves as persons.
The fact that writing too well is now a liability for students that could destroy their entire economic future is, I think, more than adequate to demonstrate that the situation has reached a point of absurdity and should not be allowed to continue like this.
I’m with you all the way on schools being fucked up.
Speaking as someone who was taught and evaluated on their ability to write in cursive, type, and eventually, use dictation software and to do math by hand, using standard and scientific then graphing calculators and eventually computer software for all sorts of calculations: these techniques build upon each other and without a foundation of understanding why and how to construct a decent sentence or evaluate an expression I wouldn’t have been able to make effective use of each successive tool and process.
Which is not to say that the focus of school should be to force memorization of multiplication tables or teach brevity with a writers cramp as a gauntlet for future earnings.
If the schools wanted to effectively teach such a progression they’d just evaluate in person and stop assigning homework. Then it’d be easy to make sure no one’s cheating (or as hard as it was when you needed to physically sneak looks at surf written on your hand).
Instead of ten journalists writing articles, soon you’ll just need one to edit what the AI writes. Quality might go down but it’ll be ten times cheaper so all the major businesses will opt for that, maybe with one other special journalist for the very important articles.
For reviews probably Easy Allies ( specifically Huber and Damiani) . Not a website but they make videos. Also possibly the only workers coop in games journalism
I've been using AI to write my emails, and it's such a help. I still need to tweak each output a bit, but it's much easier to get started when HR just gives me the name of someone I've never met, says they're my new assignment leader, and tells me to write an email introducing myself to them. Anyway, the pieces Critical uses in the video aren't really that impressive. They make grammatical sense, but that's about it. an AI would actually need to make valid and insightful arguments to replace journalists, not just hurl claims and make things up.
deleted by creator
Spell check and grammar check programs have been an integrated part of word processing software for at least a decade or two now so good luck with that.
The idea of a single original writer with original ideas is absurdly outdated. Teachers used to tell us in the 90s "You can't use a calculator on the math test because you won't be able to use a calculator in college!". They used to make us write cursive and tell us that our papers wouldn't be accepted otherwise.
Well, now we've got calculators for writing, capable software that can automatically detect and correct spelling and grammar mistakes, and systems that can handle much of the routine elements of writing.
And we're still teaching students to write like it's 1160ad even though it's no longer possible to differentiate between bad freshman writing and algorithmic content, except by accusing students of being too coherent and legible in their writing.
And now people that make Pokémon games can’t even program a calculator and a person literally writing in English is defending the idea of not teaching people how to convey their ideas clearly in the written word. Which will impact their ability to speak extemporaneously because written and verbal competency are linked.
School is a prison but knowledge and learning are not punishment.
I could have explained myself better. We should be using the tools available to us now to help people write more effectively rather than treating all possible uses of these tools as inauthentic and invalid based on antiquated notions of "originality".
Instead of investigating how automation could make a better, more effective writer academia collectively decided that any form of software assistance is not merely looked down upon, but constitutes an actual intellectual crime.
While at the same time the costs and stakes a student faces in college have risen near infinitely, creating an incentive to cheat that borders on necessity.
School is more of a prison than ever, the punishment for failure is lifelong poverty, and professors and faculty still pretend that students are there to receive a liberal arts education to better themselves as persons.
The fact that writing too well is now a liability for students that could destroy their entire economic future is, I think, more than adequate to demonstrate that the situation has reached a point of absurdity and should not be allowed to continue like this.
I’m with you all the way on schools being fucked up.
Speaking as someone who was taught and evaluated on their ability to write in cursive, type, and eventually, use dictation software and to do math by hand, using standard and scientific then graphing calculators and eventually computer software for all sorts of calculations: these techniques build upon each other and without a foundation of understanding why and how to construct a decent sentence or evaluate an expression I wouldn’t have been able to make effective use of each successive tool and process.
Which is not to say that the focus of school should be to force memorization of multiplication tables or teach brevity with a writers cramp as a gauntlet for future earnings.
If the schools wanted to effectively teach such a progression they’d just evaluate in person and stop assigning homework. Then it’d be easy to make sure no one’s cheating (or as hard as it was when you needed to physically sneak looks at surf written on your hand).
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Instead of ten journalists writing articles, soon you’ll just need one to edit what the AI writes. Quality might go down but it’ll be ten times cheaper so all the major businesses will opt for that, maybe with one other special journalist for the very important articles.
who's your favorite journalist for a gaming editorial website?
I like the majority of the Polygon folks (they aren't full of brain worms and use some leftist crit applied to gaming), also Brian David Gilbert
For reviews probably Easy Allies ( specifically Huber and Damiani) . Not a website but they make videos. Also possibly the only workers coop in games journalism