Anomalocaris ("unlike other shrimp", or "abnormal shrimp") is an extinct genus of radiodont, an order of early-diverging stem-group arthropods. The first fossils of Anomalocaris were discovered in the Ogygopsis Shale of the Stephen Formation in British Columbia, Canada by Joseph Frederick Whiteaves, with more examples found by Charles Doolittle Walcott in the Burgess Shale unit of the Stephen Formation. Other closely related fossils have been found in the older Emu Bay Shale of Australia, as well as possibly elsewhere. Originally several fossilized parts discovered separately (the mouth, frontal appendages and trunk) were thought to be three separate creatures, a misapprehension corrected by Harry B. Whittington and Derek Briggs in a 1985 journal article. With a body length close to 40 centimetres, A. canadensis is thought to be one of the earliest examples of an apex predator, though others have been found in older Cambrian lagerstätten deposits.

Anomalocaris has been misidentified several times, in part due to its makeup of a mixture of mineralized and unmineralized body parts; the mouth and frontal appendage was considerably harder and more easily fossilized than the delicate body. Anomalocaris fossils were first collected in 1886 or 1888 by Richard G. McConnell of the Geological Survey of Canada. The specimens were described and named in 1892 by GSC paleontologist Joseph Frederick Whiteaves. The specimens are now known to represent isolated frontal appendages, but Whiteaves interpreted them as the abdomens of phyllocarid crustaceans. Noting its unusual anatomy for the abdomen of a crustacean, Whiteaves gave it the name Anomalocaris, meaning "unlike other shrimps". In 1928, Danish paleontologist Kai Henriksen proposed that Tuzoia, a Burgess Shale arthropod which was known only from the carapace, represented the missing front half of Anomalocaris. The artists Elie Cheverlange and Charles R. Knight followed this interpretation in their depictions of Anomalocaris.

The interpretation of Anomalocaris as an active predator is widely accepted throughout the history of research, as its raptorial frontal appendages and mid-gut glands strongly suggest a predatory lifestyle. In the case of A. canadensis, its outstanding size amongst Burgess Shale fauna also making it one of the first apex predators known to exist.

Anomalocaris canadensis lived in the Burgess Shale in relatively great numbers, though comparable fossils have been found elsewhere, suggesting a more expansive range over the Laurentian continent. In the Burgess Shale, Anomalocaris is more common in the older sections, notably the Mount Stephen trilobite beds. However, in the younger sections, such as the Phyllopod bed, Anomalocaris could reach much greater sizes; roughly twice the size of its older, trilobite bed relatives. These rare giant specimens have previously been referred to a separate species, Anomalocaris gigantea; however, the validity of this species has been called into question, and is currently synonymized to A. canadensis.

Anomalocaris: Earth's First Predator :hex-crab:

When Giant 'Shrimps' Ruled the Earth :hexcrab-party:

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

Remember nerds, no current struggle session discussion here to the general megathread, i will ban you from the comm and remove your comment, have a good day/night :meow-coffee:

  • Ho_Chi_Chungus [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    hey guys

    one day my consciousness will probably cease to exist and that's kind of fucked

    :sadness:

    • Asa_the_Red [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Maybe it doesn't. Maybe the process of death and decay also encompasses our consciousness, and rather than simply poofing out of existence it transforms into a new thing like our body does.

    • 420stalin69
      ·
      2 years ago

      Quantum mechanics seems to imply this is all not exactly real anyway

        • 420stalin69
          ·
          2 years ago

          Local Realism being proven false. We make two assumptions about the universe and we know at least one and possibly both of these assumptions are false.

          We assume the universe is real. That reality has an objective reality independent of and external to our experience, and our experience is observing this existence.

          We assume the universe is local, meaning basically we assume things can only interact with what is “near” to them. Now the important nuance here is that interactions are limited by the speed of light. Interacting with something faster than light is equivalent to going backwards in time so if the assumption of locality is not true then this means cause and effect in time no longer necessarily come in that order.

          So two fundamental assumptions, that the universe has a state independent of us and when we look at it we measure that state, and that cause comes before effect in time (“locality” since this is another way of saying things can only interact with what is near to them, limited by the speed of light.)

          One or both of these are not true. Very possibly both are not true. Which would mean reality is actually a fuzzy messball of superposition, that there is no actual firm state to reality.

          I’m probably explaining it really poorly but if you look up “local realism” and “the bell test” you’ll find some interesting YouTube videos.