Proven long-term highly lucrative systematic exploitation of working people :is-this: Paying passive investors with their own deposits minus a hefty administrative fee
:blob-no-thoughts: Critics of a Socio-Economic Policy Try Not To Call It a Ponzi Scheme Challenge (Easy - :read-theory: , Impossible - :grillman: )
Proven long-term highly lucrative systematic exploitation of working people :is-this: Paying passive investors with their own deposits minus a hefty administrative fee
:blob-no-thoughts: Critics of a Socio-Economic Policy Try Not To Call It a Ponzi Scheme Challenge (Easy - :read-theory: , Impossible - :grillman: )
It's only called a Ponzi scheme because his targets were wealthy investors, of he was doing it to workers then he'd just be a shrewd businessman
Walked into that sentence half expecting "its only called a Ponzi scheme if it comes from the Ponzi region of Wall Street".
That's the better post right there
"Otherwise it's sparkling capitalism"