Yet again sexism is proven to be irrational and unhelpful for scientific research.
Medical science regarding the female genital anatomy is so far behind (legit decades) due to medicine being so male dominated that plenty of women have post surgical nerve damage within the groin and pubic area due to how anatomists just didn't want to study it (cuss western male chauvinism shit).
under-developed versions of penises
Aren’t penises more like over-developed versions of clitorises?
You might be thinking of the female prostate, which because some guy named it after himself was neglected for 300 years.
Somewhere between (?)-(2/3rds) of women have a prostate. There has been almost no studies on female prostates.
https://www.std-gov.org/blog/do-women-have-a-prostate/
The End · The Doors
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXqPNlng6uI
Ride the snake, ride the snake
To the lake, the ancient lake, baby
The snake, he's long, seven miles
Ride the snake
Actually such an important note about like, how science as a process an institution will embody the ideology under which it exists. We need to be careful about just accepting "studies," particularly ones that reinforce misogynistic or reactionary viewpoints, and especially ones that confirm any piece of "common sense" liberals like the tout.
I remember joking around in a lab about this, crazy to see that we were speaking truth all along. Fun fact: male snakes are either right or left-handed, just with their dicks. Never saw one that was ambidextrous (ambidickstrous)
