Lady's out here acting as an advocate for autistic people and also designing ways to industrially kill animals more efficiently. You can't claim to be empathic to animals and then build ways to slaughter them.
Lady's out here acting as an advocate for autistic people and also designing ways to industrially kill animals more efficiently. You can't claim to be empathic to animals and then build ways to slaughter them.
If stopping the slaughter of animals is so easy, you do it. Until then, why trash someone for working to make sure their last moments are more comfortable and less painful when capitalists have no incentive to care otherwise?
That’s fucking bullshit though lmao. We’re talking about the fucking slaughthouse industry for fucks sake.
I repeat: would you rather have animals tortured to death or killed cleanly? because if a single person can end the slaughter of animals, why haven't you done it yet
deleted by creator
Why are those the only options? And why am I being asked to end this alone?
Because that's the premise of the critque of Temple Grandin in this post. "Making the conditions animals are killed in 20% less terrible is bad because they should not be killed" is a garbage take unless the person making conditions less terrible also has the power to end the killing.
We live in the world we live in, not in the world that we wish we lived in.
The focus was never on making the conditions less terrible, it is always about increasing profits. Making the conditions less terrible is a nice litte PR pill I think you’re a bit too eager to swallow
deleted by creator