InevitableSwing [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 2 years agoThe NYT disabled comments on the article.imagemessage-square14 fedilinkarrow-up158file-text
arrow-up158imageThe NYT disabled comments on the article.InevitableSwing [none/use name] to chapotraphouse • 2 years agomessage-square14 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareHuldra [they/them, it/its]hexbear24·2 years agoThey should have put a disclaimer that the headline is not literal, given AmeriKKKas track record. link
minus-squareThe_Walkening [none/use name]hexbear16·2 years agoIt's literally a clickbait ad headline. I'm half-inclined to expect this to be some sort of multi-page story that's poorly written and featured on the 30% of the page that isn't ads. link
minus-squareAntoine_St_Hexubeary [none/use name]hexbear9·edit-22 years agoYou don't even need to go into the past for counterexamples. E.g. the Sandy Hook victims' families seem pretty decent. link
They should have put a disclaimer that the headline is not literal, given AmeriKKKas track record.
It's literally a clickbait ad headline. I'm half-inclined to expect this to be some sort of multi-page story that's poorly written and featured on the 30% of the page that isn't ads.
You don't even need to go into the past for counterexamples. E.g. the Sandy Hook victims' families seem pretty decent.