This site is wearing me down this past week.

edit: I am more worn down. Shouldn't have posted this thread. Feeling awful about my future.

  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Okay well then you're just a straight up covid science denier. 'Vulnerable demographics' include people who have gotten covid before. Reinfections are common. Damage is cumulative. There is no 'safe' population that it's okay to give covid to.

    And I'll add: you can't perfectly sequester the 'vulnerable' communities with a disease that's as contagious as smallpox. And either way you slice that objective reality: you're doing eugenics.

      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The science isn't whatever you want it to be. I encourage you to leave your mind palace and actually look, since it sounds like you haven't since the Omicron wave.

        And yes, a lot more people did die.

        What are you even disputing? Do you believe in herd immunity now as much as chuds did in 2020?

        • space_comrade [he/him]
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          What are you even disputing?

          I'm disputing the general sentiment here that a healthy person getting Covid (maybe even more than once) necessarily implies doom and gloom for that person for the rest of their lives.

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            Someone is either ignorant of or indifferent to the observed percentage of people who get long covid. It's high.

            And you're performing extreme cope if rhetorically your open ended let 'er rip campaign ends for each individual the second time they get it.

            Getting real "it's not going to happen to me" vibes from this conversation

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                I'm going to disengage now and I'd like you to know I stopped reading your comment when you led off with a personal anecdote wrapped in two tortillas of snark

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    "As long as I can find one industry paid scientist that says what I want to hear, the vast majority of science is just cherrypicking"

                    • Chuds circa 2002 RE: global warming

                    Look. I picked up a snowball. My personal experience is that you're wrong. Way more rational to believe what I can see, n'est pas?

                    • space_comrade [he/him]
                      ·
                      2 years ago

                      Look. I picked up a snowball.

                      Except I know of about a 100 cases of Covid from friends family and acquaintances, and many more from second or third hand stories so again unless I'm living among genetically superior ubermen or just people that are very very extremely lucky I think I have a halfway decent sample. If it was THAT bad I think I'd be seeing it a bit more death and long term illness around me. I still heard stories of death and my friends that worked in hospitals told a bunch of horror stories and that's awful but it's also not the apocalypse you're making it out to be. It doesn't have to be either the common cold or the doomsday virus, it's somewhere in between.

                      • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                        ·
                        edit-2
                        2 years ago

                        The problem with anecdotal evidence is not the sample size. It is the sampling method.

                        • space_comrade [he/him]
                          ·
                          2 years ago

                          Yes I must be mistaken, everybody around me is secretly suffering from long Covid without telling me anything about it.

            • train
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Removed by mod

      • macabrett
        hexagon
        ·
        2 years ago

        If that effect of Covid was that prevalent and as serious as you’re implying we’d be seeing a lot more dead this year.

        Have you checked America's excess deaths for 2022?

        • space_comrade [he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Looks pretty in line with expectation considering the amount of Covid infections. I don't see anything that would indicate people's immune system's collapsing en masse.

          • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            So even after killing off all the most vulnerable people, it's managing to maintain that.

            As much log is burning now as kindling when the fire started.

          • macabrett
            hexagon
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'm guessing you think the surges of flu and RSV above any previous year was due to immunity debt, a thing that was made up entirely by covid deniers?

            • train
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Removed by mod

              • macabrett
                hexagon
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yes, you're describing immunity debt, which has no basis in reality and was made up by covid deniers.

                • train
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

                • train
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

          • dallasw
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            deleted by creator

            • train
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Removed by mod

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]
                ·
                edit-2
                2 years ago

                We know covid weakens peoples immune systems not based on inference taken from how diseases propagate. We know it damages the immune system from counting T-cells in people with infections.

                THERE IS WAY TOO MUCH SPECULATION GOING ON IN THIS THREAD

                • train
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

    • train
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • MeatfuckerDidNothing [they/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t think the idea that damage is cumulative is really settled science.

        covid damages the immune system, making repeat infections more damaging. There might be confounding variables but covid damage being cumulative is absolutely settled science. Even ignoring that, if you keep rolling a d20 the chance of you rolling a 1 at some point approaches one the more you roll.

        • train
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          deleted by creator

          • MeatfuckerDidNothing [they/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            We know that covid is particularly damaging to the immune system though. Yes, all infections cause immune system damage, obviously.

            • train
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              deleted by creator

                • train
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  deleted by creator

                  • MeatfuckerDidNothing [they/them]
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    2 years ago

                    It is obvious you don't know what you're talking about here, please do some research instead of relying on half remembered biology classes. Do you think the immune response erases the stress on your circulatory system from previous infections? Even mild infections damage circulation

                    • train
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      1 year ago

                      deleted by creator

              • dat_math [they/them]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Yes, there is. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-022-02051-3