They only relaxed the amendment a little after considering pregnant women, but they still have to cover up those disgoosting lady limbs.
And yes this is one of the states with an abortion ban. :doomer:
They only relaxed the amendment a little after considering pregnant women, but they still have to cover up those disgoosting lady limbs.
And yes this is one of the states with an abortion ban. :doomer:
I think you are overreaching a bit. There is currently only one elected queer republican on capitol hill. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_LGBT_members_of_the_United_States_Congress
We're at least 30 years away from any prominent republican being trans, maybe more. We haven't even had a lesbian yet
I mean we have catholic, black, freemason, and several other kinds of republicans. The pattern is not a new one. Those groups would have gotten pirior generations frothing mad, but now it seems silly to think they were anything other than normal. It isnlike conservatives are just making it all up and have no consistent theory you know.
I think the statement of the particular construction of a hierarchy being immaterial is wrong. Nearly every oppressive society in history have been patriarchal. The few societies that weren't were either matriarchal or without rigid gender roles. I don't know if there will ever be room for a "good trans person" in the republican party the way that there is room for "good black people." Being trans is considered an inherent abomination and white nationalism has never been more popular, afaik, than white supremacy in the USA.
Before trans people are recognized by the GOP they would need to abandon patriarchy. That won't happen. If it does the party would be so unrecognizable that it may as well be something entirely different.
I have met seeing mysognistic trans folk online. There very well can be a buck angel caucus of manly men ™️ in the gop. For sure no one at the top woudl care cause they just want to win you know?