With the recent crash of the Nepalese airplane, I saw a lot of comments on :reddit-logo: talking about how Nepal has poor safety standards, bad piloting certifications, and how they buy second to third hand planes that they don’t maintain.

I’m sure that has nothing to do with capitalism.

But I also saw comments about how Euro and American standards are much, much better. I’m sure that’s true to some extent, given how many airplanes fly over these regions with so few incidents. But… I don’t really see why.

Wouldn’t the center of capitalism be more aggressive with its cost-cutting measures and safety shortcuts? It would improve their profit margins and given the Tendency, they have to take every chance they get, right?

Are we just waiting for a huge, huge sudden spike in airplane crashes as these measures start catching up?

Or is government regulation (and enforcement) still somehow strong in this industry?

  • GaveUp [she/her]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Dw, I'm fairly certain most, if not all of the large commercial airplane crashes this century have all been ClA for various reasons

    Like serious, almost all of them have been flights from/to China. They're clearly getting rid of large numbers of valuable human assets on those planes. The Malaysia one in particular has been confirmed to have a ton of important figures working in the Chinese SEMICONDUCTOR industry

    This would explain why there are so less accidents over USA and Europe as well

      • GaveUp [she/her]
        ·
        2 years ago

        The entire concept of conspiracy theories was literally invented by the ClA to discredit people discovering their ops

        You are :fedposting:

          • GaveUp [she/her]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Do you believe 9/11 happened the way they told us

            • Florist [none/use name]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Probably not

              I originally responded that way because I don't think the circumstantial evidence you brought up is enough to support your claim.

              • GaveUp [she/her]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Oh, that's true. There's a lot more though for the Malaysia flight

                I don't have sources off the top of my head but if you want to research more here's what I remember:

                Plane never found except for some scraps right after the crash. One person found a scrap of the plane many years after the crash but was conveniently killed soon afterwards and was unable to deliver the piece that he found

                Lots of weird things with the black box and flight path. Some people on islands claim they saw the plane gently land in some deserted area near the crash

                Also, getting rid of important Chinese people whenever the opportunity presents itself is a favorite pasttime of USA. The embassy in Serbia. Huawei CTO kidnapped in Canada. Two engineers working on B&R suicide bombed in Pakistan

    • iie [they/them, he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      I'm open to believing this, and I might not even be surprised, but, on the other hand, isn't a commercial plane a pretty large sample of people, skewed toward the sorts of people who fly more often? I'm not sure how unlikely it is that a random plane crash will have some passengers who are potential CIA targets.