The abyssal zone or abyssopelagic zone is a layer of the pelagic zone of the ocean. "Abyss" derives from the Greek word ἄβυσσος, meaning bottomless. At depths of 4,000 to 6,000 metres (13,000 to 20,000 ft), this zone remains in perpetual darkness. It covers 83% of the total area of the ocean and 60% of Earth's surface. The abyssal zone has temperatures around 2 to 3 °C (36 to 37 °F) through the large majority of its mass. Due to there being no light, there are no plants producing oxygen, which instead primarily comes from ice that had melted long ago from the polar regions. The water along the seafloor of this zone is actually devoid of oxygen, resulting in a death trap for organisms unable to quickly return to the oxygen-enriched water above. This region also contains a much higher concentration of nutrient salts, like nitrogen, phosphorus, and silica, due to the large amount of dead organic material that drifts down from the above ocean zones and decomposes. The water pressure can reach up to 76 megapascal
Ecosystem
Without producers, the cornerstone of most ecosystems, a unique ecosystem forms. Rather than relying on producers to form the base of the food pyramid, organisms living in the abyssal zone must feed on the dead organic detritus that falls from oceanic layers above. The biomass of the abyssal zone actually increases near the seafloor as compared to areas above as most of the decomposing material and decomposers rest on the seabed.
The sea floor of the abyssal zone consists of or is layered by different materials depending on the depth of the sea floor. If the seafloor is around 4000m below sea level, the seafloor usually consists of calcareous shells of foraminifera zooplankton and phytoplankton. At depths greater than 4000m below sea level, the seafloor lacks these shells, as they dissolve once they reach a depth greater than 4000m. This leaves behind a seafloor consisting mostly of brown clay and the remaining silica from dead zooplankton and phytoplankton. In some areas of this zone, organisms are able to sustain themselves off the products of hydrothermal vents. Some bacterial species use the vents to create and use chemical energy to produce food. For example, many of these organisms convert hydrogen sulfide to sulfate to produce chemical energy. They use that energy to synthesize the carbon-based compounds they use as food. These organisms are then preyed upon by other organisms, meaning that the bacteria can also take the place of plants as part of the bedrock for this ecosystem.
Biological adaptations
Organisms that live at this depth have had to evolve to overcome challenges provided by the abyssal zone. Fish and invertebrates had to evolve to withstand the sheer cold and intense pressure found at this level. They also had to not only find ways to hunt and survive in constant darkness but to thrive in an ecosystem that has less oxygen and biomass, energy sources or prey items, than the upper zones. To survive in a region with so few resources and low temperatures, many fish and other organisms developed a much slower metabolism and require much less oxygen than those in upper zones. Many animals also move very slowly to conserve energy. Their reproduction rates are also very slow, to decrease competition and conserve energy. Animals here typically have flexible stomachs and mouths so that when scarce food items are found they can consume as much as possible.
Other challenges faced by life in the abyssal zone are the pressure and darkness caused by the zone’s depth. Many organisms living in this zone have evolved to minimize internal air spaces, such as swim bladders. This adaptation helps to protect them from the extreme pressure, which can reach around 75 MPa (11,000 psi). The absence of light also spawned many different adaptations, such as having large eyes or the ability to produce their own light (bioluminescence). Large eyes would allow the detection and use of any light available, no matter how small. Commonly, animals in the abyssal zone are bioluminescent, producing blue light, because the blue wavelength of light is attenuated over greater travel distances than other wave lengths. Due to this lack of light, complex designs and bright colors are not needed. Most fish species have evolved to be transparent, red, or black so they better blend in with the darkness and don't waste energy on developing and maintaining bright or complex designs.
Animals
The abyssal zone is made up of many different types of organisms, including microorganisms, crustaceans, molluscan (bivalves, snails, and cephalopods), different classes of fishes, and possibly some animals that have yet to be discovered. Most of the fish species in this zone are characterized as demersal or benthopelagic fishes. Demersal fishes are a term that refers to fishes whose habitat is very close to (typically less than five meters) or on the seafloor. Most fish species fit into that classification because the seafloor contains most of the abyssal zone’s nutrients so the most complex food web or greatest biomass would be in this region of the zone.
For benthic organisms in the abyssal zone, species would need to have evolved morphological traits that could keep them out of oxygen-depleted water above the sea floor or a way to extract oxygen from the water above, but also, allow the animal access to the seafloor and the nutrients located there. There are also animals that spend their time in the upper portion of the abyssal zone, and even sometimes spending time in the zone directly above, the bathyal zone. While there are a number of different fish species representing many different groups and classes, like Actinopterygii or ray-finned fish, there are no known members of the class Chondrichthyes, animals such as sharks, rays, and chimaeras, that make the abyssal zone their primary or constant habitat. Whether this is due to the limited resources, energy availability, or other physiological constraints is unknown. Most Chondrichthyes species only go as deep as the bathyal zone.
-
Tripod fish (Bathypterois grallator): Their habitat is along the ocean floor, usually around 4,720 m below sea level. Their pelvic fins and caudal fin have long bony rays protruding from them. They face the current while standing still on their long rays. Once they sense food nearby, they use their large pectoral fins to hit the unsuspecting prey towards their mouth. Each member of this species has both male and female reproductive organs so that if a mate cannot be found, they can self fertilize.
-
Dumbo octopus: This octopus usually lives at a depth between 3,000 to 4,000 meters, deeper than any other known octopus. They use the fins on top of their head, which look like flapping ears, to hover over the sea floor looking for food. They use their arms to help change directions or crawl along the seafloor. To combat the intense pressure of the abyssal zone, this octopus species lost its ink sac during evolution. They also use their strand-like structured suction cups to help detect predators, food, and other aspects of their environment.
-
Cusk eel (Genus Bassozetus): There are no known fish that live at depths greater than the cusk eel. The depth of the cusk eel habitat can be as great as 8,370 meters below sea level. This animal's ventral fins are specialized forked barbel-like organs that act as sensory organs.
-
Abyssal grenadier: This resident of the abyssal zone is known to live at a depth ranging from 800 and 4,000 meters. It has extremely large eyes, but a small mouth. It is thought to be a semelparous species, meaning it only reproduces once and then dies after. This is seen as a way for the organism to conserve energy and have a higher chance of having some healthy strong children. This reproductive strategy could be very useful in low energy environments such as the abyssal zone.
-
Pseudoliparis swirei: the Mariana snailfish or Mariana hadal snailfish, is a species of snailfish found at hadal depths in the Mariana Trench in the western Pacific Ocean. It is known from a depth range of 6,198–8,076 m (20,335–26,496 ft), including a capture at 7,966 m (26,135 ft), which is possibly the record for a fish caught on the seafloor.
Megathreads and spaces to hang out:
- ❤️ Come listen to music and Watch movies with your fellow Hexbears nerd, in Cy.tube
- 💖 Come talk in the New weekly queer thread
- 🧡 Monthly Neurodiverse Megathread
- 💛 Read about a current topic in the news
- ⭐️ October Movie Nominations ⭐️
reminders:
- 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
- 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes struggle sessions over upbears
- 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
- 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can go here nerd
- 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog
Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):
Aid:
- 💙Comprehensive list of resources for those in need of an abortion -- reddit link
- 💙Resources for Palestine
Theory:
- ❤️Foundations of Leninism
- ❤️Anarchism and Other Essays
- ❤️Mega upload with theory for many tendencies
Remember nerds, no current struggle session discussion here to the general megathread,
Just checked out a book from the library that was last checked out before I was even born. :meow-knit:
For the entirety of my life, as I went on, this book was sitting on the same shelf waiting...
If you don't mind sharing, what book was it? I'm curious because I had something similar happen recently: I checked out "Phenomenology and Dialectical Materialism" by Tran Duc Thao and it had never been checked out before. It is stamped "new book to be circulated beginning Jul 23 1987" and I could tell by the spine it had never been opened. I kind of understand why its never been checked out, but I am shocked my library had a copy lol.
The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead because I'm a big nerd.
It must have been required reading because it was checked out 3-4 times in a month's period and then nothing until I got it.
Interesting, I didn't know Jung was into shit like that. My knowledge of psychoanalysis is sadly quite lacking, I need to get around to reading some one of these days.
You absolutely do not. Jung was just as much of a fraud as Freud was and their ideas are not just useless but actively harmful. Reputable psychologists and psychiatrists disavowed them all the way back in the 20th century and anyone who takes them seriously in any capacity should be regarded as a conman or a crank.
Well, my primary interest in learning more about psychoanalysis is to have more context for understanding certain philosophers who reference it, borrow its concepts, etc. I'm not as concerned with its efficacy as a clinical practice - I will leave that to psychology.
I don't put much stock in philosophers who build their ideas on top of false ideas. If you're going to study them remember where they laid their foundations.
That is the most cursed book title I have ever encountered in my long, miserable life and you should put it back on the shelf where you found it, then contact Miskatonic to let them know that their secret library is leaking.
This isn't just harmless :brainworms: . This is The Worm that Walks. I have never seen such a concentrated field of graft and quackery outside the lab.
No :gigachad-hd:
Gnostic gang stay winning, keep worshiping the demiurge nerd.
In all honesty, one can enjoy and even find meaning in jungian/gnostic texts without being a quack. You don't think that one of the fathers of modern psychology and an ancient christian heresy have any academic value?
I have spent high five figures in my lifetime trying to survive the crippling mental illness I was born with. I have absolutely no tolerance for quackery in the mental health field and I will die on this hill.
I have no opinion on the Gnostics. I'm an atheist so I don't really care.
But Freud and Jung set psychology and psychiatry back decades and have inflicted enormous harm on generations of people that continue to this day. If you want to study them because you have an academic interest in understanding the effect they had on society, or if you want to understand 20th century film, literature, and art that was influenced by Jung's beliefs, then I fully support you. But treating their theories as though they have any merit or should inform mental health care in any way I will protest as loudly as I can, when I'm not running around throwing bricks at psychoanalysts and related charlatans.
People suffer and die because healthcare in the US and other places is so lax and poorly regulated that Freudians and Jungians are still allowed to hang out their boards and pretend to be mental health practitioners. If I could I'd have them all rounded up and shot and I'd sleep well that night.
In a healthcare environment as shittily regulated as ours psychoanalysis, seems like a low priority to go after. Despite being absolute bullshit when it comes to the theory, people do show signs of improvement when participating. Funnily enough, most people who participate in some form of therapy feel better even if the underlying principles are bunk. The human psyche is not understood, let alone solved. Whatever ideas we hold today to be true will likely be thought of as incorrect 50 years in the future.
If your grandma can deal with pain better when she gets acupuncture and it genuinely improves her life you just nod your head and say that's great. Going off on the quackery of TCM Meridian therapy isn't going to help anyone even if you're 100% correct. Likewise, if someone wants to read Freud or Jung to help with whatever personal crisis they're going through then let them.
As long as they're not trying to fix actual physical disruptions of the brain's neurochemistry with dream analysis of course.
I need you to stop for a moment and think about how extremely ablest it is to say that a fake medical practice isn't important. Think about whose lives you're valuing, and whose you are discarding, when you say something like this. I had a much, much angrier response written but the mods asked us to be nice so I'm toning it down a lot. So please think about who is hurt by fake medical practices. People with serious mental illnesses often have among the worst economic situations in the US. They are often unable to work. They are often homeless. They face a great deal of discrimination from society at every level.
Some quack promising to help them for 400$/hr is a very serious problem for vulnerable people with serious mental illness. There are systemic problems with most therapy modalities, but Freudian and Jungian modalities stand out because they are completely baseless. A Freudian psychoanalyst is exactly as capable of relieving your mental health symptoms as a bartender, priest, hair technician, sex worker, or any random sympathetic person on the street. They don't have any special knowledge or technique. They are not medical professionals. They're just conmen. They steal money from some of the most vulnerable people in society and they need to be stopped.
Because most people with mild, situational anxiety or depression just need someone to talk to about what's causing them stress. It's that simple. The only thing that makes Freudians and Jungians and a lot of other crank psychologists special is that they charge hundreds of dollars an hour for the privilege, money that most seriously mentally ill people don't have.
Something like 25-40% of Gen Z is dealing with symptoms of depression on any given day. Suicide has always been a leading cause of death in young people and suicide rates have gone up at least 50% in the last 20 years. This is not a small problem. This is not low priority. Real, sound, effective mental health treatment is extremely important but the field is still full of cranks, charlatans, bad science, and ineffective practices.
This is no different from someone selling fake cancer drugs, or fake vaccines, or fake baby formula, or adulterated bread.
I'm not going to get started on traditional Chinese medicine because it's culturally sensitive, but I assure you I do not find the practice acceptable and I discourage people from undergoing acupuncture every time it comes up. Licensed Massage Therapists also trigger the placebo effect and you actually get a massage.
I didn't, I said that a mostly dead practice in a sea of quackery is a low priority. Certainly not something to get upset about at the mere mention that someone is reading a book about the person.
You misunderstanding of what I'm saying is so far off I have to consider it to be intentional. You first quote my comment about Freud being a low-priority and change it be about medical quackery in general. Now you change the meaning to say I think depression and suicide is a low-priority. You can't even keep what you think I mean straight in one response.
You seem to have some very strong opinions on this matter, so much so that you're twisting the same words into entirely different viewpoints depending on what you want to accuse me of in this paragraph. Here let me show you what you're doing.
Are you dismissing peoples' experiences? What about the people who don't have someone to talk to outside of a medical context? What if they don't feel comfortable talking to friends or family about sensitive subjects? Why do you want to take away practices that genuinely make them feel better?
You see how this was the literal worst possible interpretation of your words? Now imagine I quoted that same sentence again but accused you of some mutually exclusive belief as well.