• cawsby [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    More humans = more chances for diseases to develop.

    • crime [she/her, any]
      ·
      2 years ago

      It's a bit more complicated than that — factors like sanitation, public health measures, human-animal contact, and even climate play a part. Especially under capitalism "more disease happens when there are more humans" is a reasonable correlation (if reductive)

      Very important to be careful with the phrasing and with that line of thinking though, as it can easily open the door for ecofash talking points

      • cawsby [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        All of those play a part, but human population and especially urban/slum density without adequate infrastructure is the main driver.

        As human population increases - which is a good thing - some sort of worldwide health system will have to be established or disparate health systems in different areas will keep presenting new diseases.

        Smallpox was only eradicated once China jumped on board and helped in part with vaccinating Africa.

          • cawsby [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Depends on if you are human or not.

            Not so great if you are animal swimming in the sea or running through the forest.

            • newerAccountWhoDis [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Depends more on if they are USians/Euros or central African, or if they're rich or poor. There's a certain kind of people of whom there are too many

        • crime [she/her, any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          without adequate infrastructure

          Yeah totally.

          I always try to frame this as an infrastructure issue, even if number of people is the thing putting pressure on the infrastructure. Just like when Hexbear is slow because a lot of people are online, those people are just the ones putting pressure on hexbear's infrastructure