It's almost like sometimes people just want to read things and not have to go through the effort of typing out a long reply everytime they want to show that they've read something.
I only have the time to read a couple of long posts and then I have other non-online things I need to get to. The number of thoughtful replies is not going to increase with removing upbears. That would be if I had more time. If there is not a button to click , and I have to type out something thoughtful each time I wanted to interact with something to show someone I read it and it was worth their time typing out, then I would just not do that. I wouldnt be commenting more. Interaction would not increase, and I don't really see how you think people will just magically have more time on their hands by making things more difficult.
Thanks. I do think there is an addictive and people pleasing nature to upbears, but even still, I think that the quality and quantity of interaction on longer posts wouldn't be changed. Me upvoting a silly meme doesn't make me any more or less likely to actually provide a thoughtful comment to something that catches my brain.
People can and should sort by new. I always read posts that have few upbears for that reason. I've never even considered that the number of upbears is a measure of the quality of a post. I see it, as you said, as a measure of how many people have read it. I always assume that I am getting to the party early. I never judge other posts by the upbeat number - but I do want a way to see the upbears on my posts to see if people have read them. Maybe part of the issue is with the way posts are ranked?
But, providing a thoughtful comment is still an amount of effort that is not necessarily accessible on large quantities. There is a maximum of comments and discussion possible. I think that there should be levels of engagement, and I share the concern of others in this thread that removal of upbear will lead to pages of "This!" "+1" "Well said" "Agree" etc. In the comments, which frankly would negatively affect the website experience.
I wouldn't be against trying the site out without upbears and seeing how it is. I don't know how the balance between casual interaction that provides acknowledgement of effort and removing the addictive nature would be incorporated.
I'd be fine with that I think. That would address the issue I would have. I would prefer it not in DMs, it could be overwhelming. But hidden upbears, where you can just see your own posts (if you have that enables) I think would work.
It's almost like sometimes people just want to read things and not have to go through the effort of typing out a long reply everytime they want to show that they've read something.
I only have the time to read a couple of long posts and then I have other non-online things I need to get to. The number of thoughtful replies is not going to increase with removing upbears. That would be if I had more time. If there is not a button to click , and I have to type out something thoughtful each time I wanted to interact with something to show someone I read it and it was worth their time typing out, then I would just not do that. I wouldnt be commenting more. Interaction would not increase, and I don't really see how you think people will just magically have more time on their hands by making things more difficult.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Yes, and removing upbears doesnt change that.
How will removing upbears change the amount of time people have?
deleted by creator
Thanks. I do think there is an addictive and people pleasing nature to upbears, but even still, I think that the quality and quantity of interaction on longer posts wouldn't be changed. Me upvoting a silly meme doesn't make me any more or less likely to actually provide a thoughtful comment to something that catches my brain.
People can and should sort by new. I always read posts that have few upbears for that reason. I've never even considered that the number of upbears is a measure of the quality of a post. I see it, as you said, as a measure of how many people have read it. I always assume that I am getting to the party early. I never judge other posts by the upbeat number - but I do want a way to see the upbears on my posts to see if people have read them. Maybe part of the issue is with the way posts are ranked?
But, providing a thoughtful comment is still an amount of effort that is not necessarily accessible on large quantities. There is a maximum of comments and discussion possible. I think that there should be levels of engagement, and I share the concern of others in this thread that removal of upbear will lead to pages of "This!" "+1" "Well said" "Agree" etc. In the comments, which frankly would negatively affect the website experience.
I wouldn't be against trying the site out without upbears and seeing how it is. I don't know how the balance between casual interaction that provides acknowledgement of effort and removing the addictive nature would be incorporated.
deleted by creator
I'd be fine with that I think. That would address the issue I would have. I would prefer it not in DMs, it could be overwhelming. But hidden upbears, where you can just see your own posts (if you have that enables) I think would work.
deleted by creator