I wonder if there is any dogwhistling in releasing an article associating George Soros specifically with unipolarity, wonder if anything is going on there ??? They did not have to even report on this speech that they described as “boring” in the piece, really just a mystery why they would publish a piece associating the biggest target of antisemetic hate (although obviously all billionaires are bad people) with unipolarity I bet the comment sections aren’t filled with rabid antisemitism they would surely moderate such things bc they are pro denazification, very strange overall can’t make sense of it. :soviet-hmm:
And it is an opinion piece but they released it in world news not their opinion section so clearly that’s some kind of endorsement, not a good look that the writer also writes for CGTN and Xinhua gonna do mf elders of zion baiting for the emeging multipolar world
In his latest speech, the aging billionaire took potshots at world leaders who fell out of step with his liberal fantasy
…
Soros, who runs the Open Society Foundation, defined an ongoing war between so-called open societies and closed societies. He said that India’s Modi is “no democrat” and pointed to “violence against Muslims” as part of his “meteoric rise”.
…
What Soros was really rambling against wasn’t corruption or anti-democratic behavior — but the emerging multipolar world order, of which India and Türkiye are, to various degrees, becoming a part. I will not waste my time defending the likes of Modi or Erdogan, as their records are, in my opinion, indefensible. But it’s not their autocratic leanings that Soros hates about them — it’s their flickers of independence.
…
Despite what the aging “philanthropist” desires, the era of unipolar liberal hegemony is over. The world is entering a new era of multilateralism and anti-hegemony. Soros’ speech before the Munich Security Conference may, in this way, be a symbol. A symbol of how the old way of doing things dies with the ramblings of an old man while the emerging multipolar world order is born in the thunderous cry of billions of youth across the Global South.
He's speaking at the Munich Security Conference, the biggest annual meeting of transatlantic ghouls. Why do they center a Soros speech when every other western billionaire is, out of sheer class interest, as pro-NATO as Soros and when the entirity of NATO's military and political leadership is also present, and unlike Soros directly discusses Realpolitik instead of spewing an endless litany of pure ideology with chud-triggering buzzwords like "open society"? Because with centering the already established jewish bogeyman, they're baiting the queerphobic, xenophobic antisemites they pander to, which demonstrably works the way they intend it.
Unfortunately, this easily plays into NATO's propagandistic strategy of slandering all anti-imperialism as rightwing and having reactionaries take over the entirety of western anti-war sentiment. Russia has been banking exclusively on reactionary support abroad for years, completely disregarding anything that remains of the western left, as they take our support for granted even when their entire foreign agitprop strategy is to mobilize fascists. What Russia is doing here will, in the long term, make it impossible for western leftists to openly engage in pacifist action and will contribute to reducing us to a mere apendage of liberalism. You can already see how this plays out. What little anti-war protest we have in my country is entirely inaccessible to me. idk about your background, maybe you look normal enough to safely march side by side with the nazis that have infiltrated these protests and are openly welcomed by the nightmare coalition of patsocs and terfs that organize them. But i don't. i'm too clockable for that. They literally want to exterminate people like me, are you telling me i need to cooperate with them? How is that supposed to work?