They are temporarily the second group, the one you cut off from my comment and didn’t address. They are hindering the US empire and it’s ability to make war, so they are temporarily correct and deserve critical support in this rally as long as they stick to their stated platform. I’ll attend all these rallies if they exert any pressure on the US government to withdraw from its proxy war
IIRC they were saying that people who had a problem with the Rage Against the War Machine rally platforming reactionary rhetoric were either useful idiots for America or an actual op by the American government (though I might have that backwards tbh their comment was kinda cryptic). Their substack is full of stuff calling the PSL and other orgs CIA infiltrators, and tbh I don't even necessarily disagree with every criticism they make of the PSL I just think that the CIA allegations are unsubstantiated and that the tone and focus of the author in all of their posts is so internet brained that it's completely disconnected from reality. Like yes, Veterans for Peace has a lot of liberals in it and leading it, great investigative reporting there comrade.
I honestly have no clue why they tagged the people they tagged. Maybe because we commented a way they liked or didn't like in a thread about it?
I'm sorry but it's hard to take you serious when I'm reading the first paragraph of a multi-page epic substack essay and you're unironically spelling it "amerika".
Are you just a straight up pro-war Natoid because you’re starting to sound like one?
deleted by creator
Muh both sides
deleted by creator
Russia and the anti-imperialist bloc, and all those within the imperialist bloc who cause it any hinderance or damage in its ability to make war
deleted by creator
They are temporarily the second group, the one you cut off from my comment and didn’t address. They are hindering the US empire and it’s ability to make war, so they are temporarily correct and deserve critical support in this rally as long as they stick to their stated platform. I’ll attend all these rallies if they exert any pressure on the US government to withdraw from its proxy war
Removed by mod
:jesse-wtf:
lmao touch grass :data-laughing:
edit: I presume you're talking about this article. I find your "secrecy" hilarious but I will read it in good faith.
deleted by creator
IIRC they were saying that people who had a problem with the Rage Against the War Machine rally platforming reactionary rhetoric were either useful idiots for America or an actual op by the American government (though I might have that backwards tbh their comment was kinda cryptic). Their substack is full of stuff calling the PSL and other orgs CIA infiltrators, and tbh I don't even necessarily disagree with every criticism they make of the PSL I just think that the CIA allegations are unsubstantiated and that the tone and focus of the author in all of their posts is so internet brained that it's completely disconnected from reality. Like yes, Veterans for Peace has a lot of liberals in it and leading it, great investigative reporting there comrade.
I honestly have no clue why they tagged the people they tagged. Maybe because we commented a way they liked or didn't like in a thread about it?
Removed by mod
I'm sorry but it's hard to take you serious when I'm reading the first paragraph of a multi-page epic substack essay and you're unironically spelling it "amerika".
deleted by creator
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
Removed by mod