CredibleBattery [he/him, comrade/them] to news • 2 years agoAI-created images that have no ''human authorship" to lose Copyrightsexternal-linkmessage-square18 fedilinkarrow-up143file-text
arrow-up143external-linkAI-created images that have no ''human authorship" to lose CopyrightsCredibleBattery [he/him, comrade/them] to news • 2 years agomessage-square18 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squaregroundling20XX [none/use name]hexbear21·2 years agoI expect AI production with small human tweaking to make copyright enforceable is the logical answer here. link
minus-squareBeriaInocenceProject [he/him]hexbear17·2 years agoThe copyright office rejected that argument in the same letter. The author's small changes weren't a “sufficient amount of original authorship” . link
minus-squareCredibleBattery [he/him, comrade/them]hexagonhexbear11·edit-22 years agosoon enough we'll have techbros claiming that writing a prompt is enough ''human authorship'' to be protected by copyright link
I expect AI production with small human tweaking to make copyright enforceable is the logical answer here.
The copyright office rejected that argument in the same letter. The author's small changes weren't a “sufficient amount of original authorship” .
soon enough we'll have techbros claiming that writing a prompt is enough ''human authorship'' to be protected by copyright