*said freedom does not apply to Native Americans, Black People, women, and poor white people

  • DoubleShot [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Yeah there's also the issue (I think Zinn brings this up too) that we know slaveholders at the time were scared as shit of slave revolts. That tells me they absolutely knew that slaves hated being slaves (surprise surprise). So slave owners knowingly perpetuated a system that they knew was incredibly oppressive.

    Imagine you are a slave owner. You are literally surrounded by slaves all day. You see them work all day at your plantation in miserable conditions. You see them get beaten. You sell their children off (which any human being knows is so fucking evil) and break up married couples. You also know they hate their condition and would rebel if they were given the opportunity (and kill you without remorse in the process). And yet, you choose to keep such a system in place - hell, you consider maintaining this system to be the most important political aim possible. Now tell me with a straight face, Mr. Smithsonian, that I am not morally culpable here.

    And for people who say "tHeRe'S aLwAyS bEEn sLaVeRy"... yeah, sure. But the type of chattel slavery that was brought upon the people of Africa was really on a whole other level. I mean, the transatlantic trip alone was a horror beyond words and has no parallel among any society with slaves, ever.

    • nohaybanda [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      “tHeRe’S aLwAyS bEEn sLaVeRy”

      And there's always been a struggle for liberation from slavery. The moment shackles were first put on a human being that struggle was born. The only way to believe that abolition wasn't a widely held belief is to deny the humanity of the enslaved.

    • richietozier4 [he/him]
      hexagon
      ·
      2 years ago

      tHeRe’S aLwAyS bEEn sLaVeRy

      not defending it or anything, but for most of human history, slavery was "you owe me money/I kicked your ass in a war", not "the very nature of you and your people is to be subservient".