The original reporting this refers to is kind of weird. There is no quote offered where she mentions regime change, no video or even explicit statement that she is answering a question about regime change when she says “The goal is definitely to do that, is to weaken Russia’s ability to launch very difficult attacks against Ukraine. We want also to make sure that Putin and his enablers are held to account."
I'm not saying she didn't say it, but it's kind of fishy, like this is a very slippery newspaper (for USians - this is a reactionary rag that hates Trudeau) and if she really said that in response to a question about regime change it's weird that they left the detail out.
Makes me wonder if they're just interpreting "holding Putin to account" as regime change, which would be a really fringe interpretation of the sentence.
The original reporting this refers to is kind of weird. There is no quote offered where she mentions regime change, no video or even explicit statement that she is answering a question about regime change when she says “The goal is definitely to do that, is to weaken Russia’s ability to launch very difficult attacks against Ukraine. We want also to make sure that Putin and his enablers are held to account."
I'm not saying she didn't say it, but it's kind of fishy, like this is a very slippery newspaper (for USians - this is a reactionary rag that hates Trudeau) and if she really said that in response to a question about regime change it's weird that they left the detail out.
Makes me wonder if they're just interpreting "holding Putin to account" as regime change, which would be a really fringe interpretation of the sentence.
deleted by creator
To be clear, the fringe interpretation I'm referring to would be that of the National Post, they put it in their headline.
I mean, it is an American newspaper.