Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to chapotraphouse • edit-22 years agoThe state of bourgeoisie 'News'imagemessage-square82 fedilinkarrow-up167file-text
arrow-up167imageThe state of bourgeoisie 'News'Dirt_Owl [comrade/them, they/them] to chapotraphouse • edit-22 years agomessage-square82 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
Edit: Guys the point is this isn't newsworthy and that the News is posting clickbait, you don't have to solve the maths lmao
minus-squareGaveUp [she/her]hexbear8·2 years agoDamn, I have a math degree and I still got this question wrong link
minus-squareAssian_Candor [comrade/them]hexbear10·2 years agoIt’s common convention in mathematics to do implied multiplication before explicit ones… but this question is a troll so let’s not get trolled link
minus-squareaaaaaaadjsf [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear5·2 years agoIt's an easy mistake to make, I've added what I think are the main reasons people get it wrong. I'm definitely guilty of seeing everything to the right of a division sign as part of the denominator of a fraction of I don't focus. link
minus-squaregoatmeal [none/use name]hexbear2·2 years agoYou're too modest! You got it right. 2 correct answers. It’s also 1 which is what I got. The problem is in the way it's written. link
Damn, I have a math degree and I still got this question wrong
It’s common convention in mathematics to do implied multiplication before explicit ones… but this question is a troll so let’s not get trolled
It's 9?
It's an easy mistake to make, I've added what I think are the main reasons people get it wrong. I'm definitely guilty of seeing everything to the right of a division sign as part of the denominator of a fraction of I don't focus.
You're too modest! You got it right. 2 correct answers. It’s also 1 which is what I got. The problem is in the way it's written.
deleted by creator