On this day in 1999, the first NATO airstrikes of Yugoslavia began, initiating a wave of violence that killed 1,500 people, damaging hospitals, schools, cultural monuments, and private businesses alongside military targets. The bombings lasted until June 10th of that year.

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization's (NATO) bombing campaign was its first military action taken without the endorsement of the U.N. Security Council. James Byron Bissett, former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, called the campaign a "war crime", and Noam Chomsky referred to it as an act of "terrorism".

Supporters for the campaign claimed the bombing was necessary to stop a genocide of ethnic Albanians in Kosovo and to remove Slobodan Milošević from power, although claims made by the Clinton administration along these lines were later found to be highly exaggerated.

Approximately 500 of the people killed were civilians, and the bombs damaged many civilian structures alongside legitimate military targets. Chomsky has argued that the main objective of the NATO intervention was to integrate Yugoslavia into the Western neoliberal social and economic system.

In 2000, Michael Parenti authored "To Kill a Nation: The Attack on Yugoslavia", which argues that the bombing was predicated on capitalist rather than humanitarian interests.

A Review of NATO’s War over Kosovo - Noam Chomsky :chompsky:

Michael Parenti - To Kill A Nation :parenti-hands:

The Srebrenica Precedent :amerikkka:

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

  • MF_COOM [he/him]
    ·
    2 years ago

    There’s talk about building log cabins.

    That's fucking sick

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          They won't be or if they are it'll draw too much attention and the city will tear it down The livestock on the sidewalk is going pretty far already

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              I hope rent goes down. Unfortunately it's just not gonna be the case. Winter is ending and the homeless that could tske up hotel shelters paid by the city are gonna be back out as well and the always on the street homeless population is gonna go up more than double and the city has been cracking down on diy solutions since covid 'ended'.

      • MF_COOM [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Yes, but homeless people can do sick shit sometimes

        • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
          ·
          2 years ago

          Oh yeah, all credit there for sure. The situation that they need to do this is awful and sick in the bad way but turning a butnof woodland into the best dang shiny town you can is absolutely cool and admirable. But ykmow, none of them WANT to be doing this, as badass as it may be.

          • MF_COOM [he/him]
            ·
            2 years ago

            Lmao you're on a communist site comrade nobody here thinks homeless people want to be homeless or don't think homelessness is a cruel, degrading, lethal tragedy

            • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
              ·
              2 years ago

              Yes, and they're my personal friends living under these conditions. So yeah, they're doing the best they can and I can applaud that but it's not 'sick' or something to laug your ass off over. They spent -40c nights in a tent this winter.

              • MF_COOM [he/him]
                ·
                2 years ago

                Nobody is laughing at them. Nonconsentually building housing on city property because your neoliberal hell hole refuses to house its populace is fucking badass and I'm not going to pretend it isn't

                • GalaxyBrain [they/them]
                  ·
                  2 years ago

                  Cool, go do it yourself then. It's badass but it's so they don't have to live in a tent next winter and the city will shut this down before next winter if they build anything remotely permanent