I wasn't trying to accuse you I was asking why there is a difference in perception. My assumption was that if something is a cartoon and obviously not real it's not a problem so I would not think anyone furry or feral was a zoophile. And that has been clarified. I'll delete my earlier comments
Distance from reality, probably. Like probably nearly all furries aren't attracted to real animals, they're attracted to animals that are heavily anthropomorphized. There is neither the same significant transformation applied to lolicon (they're supposed to look and be like children) nor the same lack of overlap of attraction to real beings.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
I wasn't trying to accuse you I was asking why there is a difference in perception. My assumption was that if something is a cartoon and obviously not real it's not a problem so I would not think anyone furry or feral was a zoophile. And that has been clarified. I'll delete my earlier comments
deleted by creator
Distance from reality, probably. Like probably nearly all furries aren't attracted to real animals, they're attracted to animals that are heavily anthropomorphized. There is neither the same significant transformation applied to lolicon (they're supposed to look and be like children) nor the same lack of overlap of attraction to real beings.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator